Spray arc...

[dragoneggs]

Interesting, showing my age now. Never seen the process for structural work. Back in my day Spray Arc was used for building up worn parts for re-machining to restore it back to original specification. We sent out compressor parts to specialty shop. We had problems with the new layer peeling off do to poor bond. That was caused by sloppy cleaning. They found parts had to be cleaned and pickled for best results. On shafts they cut the bearing surfaces down several thousands to get a heavier layer; still had to clean before welding. Overall it was a good process when done right.

Carl do you have the equipment to do spray arc? I would like to come over and watch it done. May Mark would also.

Ron

Shoot... count me in!

 

[Dadnatron]

No! Spray arc is only good for high production work. Basically, it is a pain:thumbdown:. Metal has to be really clean. I played with it some, I was impressed with the speed. But it is not worth it to me!:thumbdown:

What would be your recommendation, as a good technique for my needs?

I want to insure that I've at least learned and understood the rudiments of a technique which will allow me to repair and fabricate farm equipment. Some lighter fabrication as well, but at this point, I'm mainly wanting to insure that if something breaks, I have the technique understood well enough to have a good chance of adequately repairing it.

I'd also like the skill/knowledge, to be able to fabricate something, should I so choose. At this point, I have 18hrs more in the class, and I'd like to use it to 'master' (yes I say that tongue in cheek) a good all around technique in multiple ways, in order to maximize my ability to stick a couple of pieces of metal together.

I'm thinking MIG, btw.

 

[Shield Arc]

Carl do you have the equipment to do spray arc? I would like to come over and watch it done. May Mark would also.

Ron

Ron my Lincoln V350-Pro will do spray arc, but I would have to rent a bottle of C-10 gas again.

 

[Shield Arc]

What would be your recommendation, as a good technique for my needs?
I'm thinking MIG, btw.

Buy a good quality Mig welder for general fab work. If you have to weld outside make sure to get a self shielded flux core gun. I've run flux core in Alaska in 90-MPH wind.

 

[MinnesotaDaveChalmers]

Buy a good quality Mig welder for general fab work. If you have to weld outside make sure to get a self shielded flux core gun. I've run flux core in Alaska in 90-MPH wind.

I agree - standard solid wire mig, and self shielded flux core, are the most versatile for general home/farm work if you aren't going to stick weld.

Both wires are available almost everywhere.
Solid wire shielding gas of 75/25 argon/co2 or 100% co2 are commonly stocked.

 

[Dadnatron]

Here is a question that I thought I understood, but some have made comments to make me wonder.

Flux core is basically MIG wire with a flux imbedded in the center of the wire.?.

I've seen people speak of 'Self shielded Flux core' but my impression is that is exactly what all Flux Core is... the essential basis is that it has its own 'flux' hence 'shielding. Is there 'another' type of flux core wire?

I understand (or thought I did) the concept of 'dual shielded flux core', but my thought was that it was simply Flux core wire which also was utilizing regular 'MIG' gas as a dual shield. Is this not the case?

1. Are there different 'flux core wire' types? Non-self shielding?
2. Is dual shielded different than my conception above? And why use dual shielding in such a manner if you/I can use Flux Core in 89mph winds. (I'm sure I couldn't handle 90mph)
3. What is a 'flux core gun' vs a standard Mig gun? Is it simply a MIG gun without the gas port? Is there an advantage?

I thought I had a tenable hold on this stuff, but now it seems I have less grasp than I had believed.

 

[Shield Arc]

Dual shield has gas coverage. It produces a heavy slag. Some dual shield wires can run on 75% argon, and 25% CO2. Other dual shield wires require 100% CO2.

Self shielded flux core wire does not need gas coverage.

If your Mig gun has a 1/16-inch liner in it, you might get away with running .045-inch self shielded wire. Self shielded wire is real stiff. And when it gets hot it will expand, and freeze up in most Mig gun liners.

First picture is a Lincoln K-126 self shielded flux core gun.
Second Picture is Lincoln's NR-212 self shielded wire.

 

[Dadnatron]

I see.

So Self shielded flux core and dual shielded flux core are DIFFERENT types of wire? I didn't recognize this was the case. I suspect it is the specific flux in dual shielded wire which results in the large slag deposit.

What are the benefits for dual shielded vs either Self shielded or MIG. I suspect, given gas is required, that MIG and Dual shielded would have to have the same basic 'environment'.

And to be clear, you point about the guns is that flux core wire is typically stiffer and therefore, might require or run better in a gun designed for the stiffer/bigger wire? As opposed to a MIG gun which is designed predominately for a more malleable MIG wire?

At what point would you purchase a Flux Core gun rather than use a MIG gun? Basically, is running flux core through a MIG gun only a problem with big wires or are there other issues that are likely to show up, if flux core is used. I ask, because at this point, I was thinking that Flux Core would be the most common technique for me in the near future, given that most of my welding will be done outside.

 

[Shield Arc]

When you run dual shield, or self shielded flux core wire you need serrated drive rolls inside the wire feeder.
Dual shield wire will work fine in a Mig gun. Bigger self shielded wire will not work in a Mig gun! Like I said before, you might get .045-inch self shielded wire to work in a Mig gun with a 1/16-inch liner.
If I'm not mistaken dual shield is considered low hydrogen filler. A lot of self shielded wires, like NR-211, NR-212, Hobart's 21B are T-11 wires. Which is not low hydrogen filler. Self shielded wire like NR-232, NR-233, ESAB's Coreshield 8, are T-8 wires, which is low hydrogen filler.
Before the Northridge earthquake in California, we ran T-11 wires on everything. Now any seismic welding requires T-8 wire.

 

[MinnesotaDaveChalmers]

I see.

So Self shielded flux core and dual shielded flux core are DIFFERENT types of wire? I didn't recognize this was the case. I suspect it is the specific flux in dual shielded wire which results in the large slag deposit.

What are the benefits for dual shielded vs either Self shielded or MIG. I suspect, given gas is required, that MIG and Dual shielded would have to have the same basic 'environment'.

And to be clear, you point about the guns is that flux core wire is typically stiffer and therefore, might require or run better in a gun designed for the stiffer/bigger wire? As opposed to a MIG gun which is designed predominately for a more malleable MIG wire?

At what point would you purchase a Flux Core gun rather than use a MIG gun? Basically, is running flux core through a MIG gun only a problem with big wires or are there other issues that are likely to show up, if flux core is used. I ask, because at this point, I was thinking that Flux Core would be the most common technique for me in the near future, given that most of my welding will be done outside.

My take, in order:

Yes, self shielded vs. dual shield (also called outer shield) are 2 different types.
Both have flux cores, but the dual shield also needs a shielding gas.

Dual shield lays down more wire faster and "hotter" - I have not used it yet, saw the video and am now an expert
(my first roll of it just came in)

Mig guns are rated for amps and duty cycle based on 100% co2 (at least all the one's I have are).
When used with argon/co2 they heat up faster and it reduces duty cycle.
Same for self shielded wire - no gas going through it at all in that case so they heat up fast.

Get a flux core gun if yours can't keep up without overheating (in my opinion).
I use my regular M-25 miller mig gun for .035" flux core sometimes and it has survived so far.