Starlink

[ernemats]

Have you tested the speed yet and do you have any problems with obstructions? Congrats, still waiting on mine

 

[Fallon]

Hmm, i don't have a good way to measure current draw. If i come up with something, i'll post results.

P3 P4400 Kill A Watt Electricity Usage Monitor https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00009MDBU/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_glt_fabc_AVP51KD6HCZXJTZG7H8Q

They work great & don't require putting a multimeter inline with live 110v or what not.

 

[IXLR8]

I have found a fair number of library's in my area have the Kill-A-Watt meter that you can sign out for a week rather than buying your own. Might be worth checking into.

 

[BigBlue1]

I have found a fair number of library's in my area have the Kill-A-Watt meter that you can sign out for a week rather than buying your own. Might be worth checking into.

Or your local electric cooperative (electric supplier)...

 

[cqaigy2]

I did speed test thru the starlink app, said 71Mb to the router. speed test on phone, connected with 2.4 GHz wifi, 45.7 down 7.5 up 51ms test server OneProvider.com, Seattle. Just did PC, speedtest.net Seattle WA, 2.4 GHz WiFi, 33.25 down 11.94 up 64ms

I may need to redo part of my network, i'm using same address space as the starlink router. I haven't tried direct connection to ethernet from either POE injector, nor on the starlink router. I'll probably leave the starlink router in the mix for now, so i can check on some of the debug stuff.

 

[ponytug]

I did speed test thru the starlink app, said 71Mb to the router. speed test on phone, connected with 2.4 GHz wifi, 45.7 down 7.5 up 51ms test server OneProvider.com, Seattle. Just did PC, speedtest.net Seattle WA, 2.4 GHz WiFi, 33.25 down 11.94 up 64ms

I may need to redo part of my network, i'm using same address space as the starlink router. I haven't tried direct connection to ethernet from either POE injector, nor on the starlink router. I'll probably leave the starlink router in the mix for now, so i can check on some of the debug stuff.

FWIW: You might want to switch to 5GHz; 2.4GHz is never going to be very fast. The downside is distance. Even 15' distance from the router/access point can cause a significant drop off in speed as do walls. For high speeds, we all probably need a few more access points or mesh networks. I know that I do. I may be "old school", but I try to have everything wired that can be, except for things like phones and tablets. The performance difference is huge. Granted on DSL and going out to the outside world, you would never notice, but for local items like backups to network attached storage, it makes a big difference. With Starlink, you could be leaving quite a bit of performance on the table.

There is also the issue of double NAT; if you are using your router and the Starlink router, it is a good idea to turn off the DHCP service on your router, and make sure that your router knows the gateway is the Starlink router. Having double NAT will definitely slow you down.

All the best,

Peter

 

[forgeblast]

Just wondering, with starlink do you need to buy a router or does it come with one?

 

[Jchonline]

Just wondering, with starlink do you need to buy a router or does it come with one?

Comes with one, but the configuration on it is very limited. You can change the wifi network, view devices on it, thats about it. No firewall management, no port config, etc.

 

[cqaigy2]

Yes, as Jchonline said, not much on the router. I did notice that the router mentioned wpa3 as an option, but needed an update to enable it. You can enable split 2.4 and 5GHz, but it that requires reboot. Also as Peter mentioned, 2.4 GHz max theoretical on a single connection would be 54Mb and i don't think the starlink router is capable of MIMO, multi in multi out. As i previously mention with the starlink app speed test, it showed 72Mb to the router, so definitely faster than 2.4 GHz WiFi. I'll be playing with and without the starlik router as the WAN connection to my existing firewall. And im going to move the dish again, to a better location, as far as connecting it into my existing network. Over all, with just the default setup i did, very happy with the speed and latency. I don't do any gaming, so have nothing to report on that. I do a far bit of zoom and ms teams calls, that will be interesting to see how it goes, if it's a problem i can do as i do now and use my cell phone for audio, and join the computer separately. Haven't tried any VPN, ssl or IPSEC yet. My time playing with starlink will be a bit limited due to familial issues.

 

[Fallon]

FWIW: You might want to switch to 5GHz; 2.4GHz is never going to be very fast. The downside is distance. Even 15' distance from the router/access point can cause a significant drop off in speed as do walls. For high speeds, we all probably need a few more access points or mesh networks. I know that I do. I may be "old school", but I try to have everything wired that can be, except for things like phones and tablets. The performance difference is huge. Granted on DSL and going out to the outside world, you would never notice, but for local items like backups to network attached storage, it makes a big difference. With Starlink, you could be leaving quite a bit of performance on the table.

There is also the issue of double NAT; if you are using your router and the Starlink router, it is a good idea to turn off the DHCP service on your router, and make sure that your router knows the gateway is the Starlink router. Having double NAT will definitely slow you down.

All the best,

Peter

2.4ghz can support up to 600 Mbps in some configurations, generally 802.11n using MIMO & 40mhz channels instead of 20mhz. Plenty to far exceed Starlink capacities.

The lower the frequency the faster the signal will go & the better penetration through walls & other objects. The higher the frequency, the more the theoretical & practical bandwidth.

2.4ghz especially has issues with shared bandwidth. It's more commonly used & travels farther, so your neighbors can interfere with your signal even if they aren't on your network. 5ghzs shorter range actually helps in this respect. Although given Starlinks audience nearby neighbors aren't going to be much of an issue compared to an apartment complex with 100+ networks trying g to Shar the same 3 non-overlapping 2.4ghz frequencies. The higher bandwidth stuff like 40mhz channel's & MIMO interfere with your neighbors even more.

While double or triple NAT isn't great in theory, I've rarely if ever seen any problems with it in practice. I've ran it for years as my ISP NATs, I NAT for my main network & occasionally triple NAT to some lab networks I spin up. Using consumer home routers with triple NAT I still max out my 25 megabit connection at about 25 megabit easily.

I do agree on wire bring superior to wireless though. I run copper or fiber for everything I have right of way to & isn't mobile.