Mark.... a boundary line agreement wouldn't effect a county boundary line, since this should already set with a legal description. If there is a discrepancy as to exactly what or where the county line is, the counties involved should be the ones to come to agreement as to the proper legal terminology defining that boundary. Once that was done, in theory, your boundaries would also change to be consistent with the new determination. This also might be a reason that the counties wouldn't want to enter into negotiations with each other. Some land owner might get upset and start a legal action against one or the other counties, depending on if he was gaining or loosing land. It certainly would make for an interesting situation if the counties wouldn't want to agree to the determination and you and your neighbor were to do this on your own. In effect, you would be removing the terminology "along the county line" and inserting a proper legal description with degrees and distances. What would be real interesting is if the new boundaries were to effect the amount of land to the point that taxes would be dramatically effected on one side being less and the other side being more. The county that would be loosing, might get upset about the loss. I am not a lawyer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn once, so my "opinion" should be taken along with a few grains of salt. I make my statement based on reason, not legal interpretation of what is reasonable.. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif