Mike476
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 1,080
- Location
- Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia
- Tractor
- MF 135 Z134 Continental, MF 1660 Cab
I too agree with a lot of what's been said but would like to add, as someone whose eldest daughter just completed her bachelor's degree in animal science and whose youngest is starting her second year in nuclear medecine, that with the cost of post secondary educations today it is a tremendous risk that, even with the best preparation, is a gamble. If you are fortunate enough to be able to offer a college / University education to your kids you need to start talking about it with them early, utilising school counsellors and keeping up on the ever-changing world economies to see where the future lies to be able to make as sound a decision as possible when helping your kids make their choice. Otherwise all your kids will have in the eyes of future employers are the critical thinking skills thought to be gained from a post-secondary education.
Certainly fields such as medecine are relatively safe but there are no guarantees, and while as parents we plan from birth for this, the costs today far exceed predictions made in the late 80's, which were at that time thought to be excessive.
Science departments in Universities today are little else than R&D centers, with the students themselves making significant contributions towards the development of their fields. Classes are composed of upwards of 600 students, and the professors do little else than recite literature / PPT presentations found on the Universities web page (accesible only by students of the University of course). It's obvious with classes of this size there is liitle to no opportunity for students to benefit from the experience or perspective of the professional they've paid good money to learn from.
I only have my high school diploma, and while the average worker of the generation mine replaced had a grade 9 education, I don't know that we were any better prepared to take on the changes of the past 30+ years than they would have been if it were their times. I don't know that our kids will be any better off either, even with University degrees, but as parents we try to provide our kids with every tool we can to ensure they have options, the rest is up to them.
As a final note, as a NCM of the CF (CWO or E-9 in US), I've always debated a formal education as an absolute prerequisite to holding senior positions. We as a society have come to expect that our leaders are well educated, to the point where experience has taken a seat at the rear of the bus. We favour those well educated while those who have been in the trenches "doing the job" are only able to achieve a somewhat lesser position of authority. I often wonder if we reversed these roles, where those with experince were able to employ the critical thinking skills and sobering input from those with a formal education, if we would be where we are today. I received a call a couple of months ago from one of our develoment cells looking for one of my warrant officers because they were "in need of someone whose critical thinking skills were derived form somehere other than a formal education!" I chuckled to myself and provided him with a very sharp-minded individual whose life-experiences in the CF have provided him with clear and uncluttered perspective, I'm certain he will be a benefit to them....
Apologies for the long post, bit of a bone of contention with me.
Certainly fields such as medecine are relatively safe but there are no guarantees, and while as parents we plan from birth for this, the costs today far exceed predictions made in the late 80's, which were at that time thought to be excessive.
Science departments in Universities today are little else than R&D centers, with the students themselves making significant contributions towards the development of their fields. Classes are composed of upwards of 600 students, and the professors do little else than recite literature / PPT presentations found on the Universities web page (accesible only by students of the University of course). It's obvious with classes of this size there is liitle to no opportunity for students to benefit from the experience or perspective of the professional they've paid good money to learn from.
I only have my high school diploma, and while the average worker of the generation mine replaced had a grade 9 education, I don't know that we were any better prepared to take on the changes of the past 30+ years than they would have been if it were their times. I don't know that our kids will be any better off either, even with University degrees, but as parents we try to provide our kids with every tool we can to ensure they have options, the rest is up to them.
As a final note, as a NCM of the CF (CWO or E-9 in US), I've always debated a formal education as an absolute prerequisite to holding senior positions. We as a society have come to expect that our leaders are well educated, to the point where experience has taken a seat at the rear of the bus. We favour those well educated while those who have been in the trenches "doing the job" are only able to achieve a somewhat lesser position of authority. I often wonder if we reversed these roles, where those with experince were able to employ the critical thinking skills and sobering input from those with a formal education, if we would be where we are today. I received a call a couple of months ago from one of our develoment cells looking for one of my warrant officers because they were "in need of someone whose critical thinking skills were derived form somehere other than a formal education!" I chuckled to myself and provided him with a very sharp-minded individual whose life-experiences in the CF have provided him with clear and uncluttered perspective, I'm certain he will be a benefit to them....
Apologies for the long post, bit of a bone of contention with me.