AndyM
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2003
- Messages
- 2,369
- Location
- NW PA, USA
- Tractor
- 1948 Ford 8N and 1993 Toro WheelHorse 520H
OK, you don't have to buy another tractor to get together! /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Test drive for a new owner
- Thread starter NIXON
- Start date
- Views: 5185
rockyridgefarm
Elite Member
OK. if you get together, you have to eat a dumplin for me! I probably won't get to be there in person....
AndyM
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2003
- Messages
- 2,369
- Location
- NW PA, USA
- Tractor
- 1948 Ford 8N and 1993 Toro WheelHorse 520H
Stonebase (John) was over this morning to check out and test drive my New Holland. He's the first person on TBN that I've met in person, and a heck of a nice fellow. Things are pretty muddy and wet here, so I couldn't get him to do any of my yardwork /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif, but he did take my TC18 for a test drive. Here's a picture...
Maybe we can get Cerberus and other locals to join in for a Youngstown/Sharon/New Castle chapter TBN get together sometime, and maybe even have Henro drive his Kubota up from Pittsburgh. We'll all pitch in and help him drill holes in his ROPS. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Maybe we can get Cerberus and other locals to join in for a Youngstown/Sharon/New Castle chapter TBN get together sometime, and maybe even have Henro drive his Kubota up from Pittsburgh. We'll all pitch in and help him drill holes in his ROPS. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Attachments
stonebase
Bronze Member
Thanks again to Andy for the seat time on his New Holland. Nice machine, good ergonomics, good fit and finish.... I think I discovered another choice that just may make my final decision even more difficult...the standard transmission!!!
Andy, good luck with all your future projects in the yard. A get together someday sounds great. Here's a picture of the proud owner (AndyM)......
Andy, good luck with all your future projects in the yard. A get together someday sounds great. Here's a picture of the proud owner (AndyM)......
Attachments
stonebase
Bronze Member
AndyM
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2003
- Messages
- 2,369
- Location
- NW PA, USA
- Tractor
- 1948 Ford 8N and 1993 Toro WheelHorse 520H
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Thanks again to Andy for the seat time on his New Holland. Nice machine, good ergonomics, good fit and finish.... I think I discovered another choice that just may make my final decision even more difficult...the standard transmission!!! )</font>
When I was looking to buy a tractor, I test drove a hydrostat model, and it just plain felt uncomfortable and unnatural for my foot and ankle to work the pedal. I settled for the gear model, but our property is very flat. I set it in the gear and range I need it in and I go about my work. The only time I need to switch to another gear or range is when I've stopped and I'm about to start working on something different. I simply felt that the gear model was better for my needs, although for some reason it sets everyone off every time I mention how much I love my gear model over a hydro model. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
John has driven both now, and he will have to make the same decision based on his needs.
I wanted to get the lightest tractor I could and still get a 60 inch mower. Our property is wet and the 3000 pound Ford 8N tore things up pretty bad last summer, so I settled on the TC18, which was a shade over 1400 pounds. John has 5 acres, flat and wide open, without any trees. I'm thinking he needs something a little larger, big enough to support a 72 inch mower. I think the TC30 is an excellent value (priced about the same as a TC24). He's also checked out Kubota and Kioti.
P.S. I'm jealous of the pictures of his new pole building! /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif Hopefully I'll be able to build one later this summer.
When I was looking to buy a tractor, I test drove a hydrostat model, and it just plain felt uncomfortable and unnatural for my foot and ankle to work the pedal. I settled for the gear model, but our property is very flat. I set it in the gear and range I need it in and I go about my work. The only time I need to switch to another gear or range is when I've stopped and I'm about to start working on something different. I simply felt that the gear model was better for my needs, although for some reason it sets everyone off every time I mention how much I love my gear model over a hydro model. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
John has driven both now, and he will have to make the same decision based on his needs.
I wanted to get the lightest tractor I could and still get a 60 inch mower. Our property is wet and the 3000 pound Ford 8N tore things up pretty bad last summer, so I settled on the TC18, which was a shade over 1400 pounds. John has 5 acres, flat and wide open, without any trees. I'm thinking he needs something a little larger, big enough to support a 72 inch mower. I think the TC30 is an excellent value (priced about the same as a TC24). He's also checked out Kubota and Kioti.
P.S. I'm jealous of the pictures of his new pole building! /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif Hopefully I'll be able to build one later this summer.
stonebase
Bronze Member
Bird
Rest in Peace
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( for some reason it sets everyone off every time I mention how much I love my gear model over a hydro model )</font>
No reason for it set anyone off. They still make both transmissions because there's a place for both and personal preference is an important factor for any of us. Yes, I much prefer the hydrostatic for the jobs I did with my own tractors, but I have a lot more hours on old gear models and for some jobs the gear models have a definite advantage.
I've not yet used a tractor with a synchromesh transmission, but figure that has to be a great improvement. I still remember what a great improvement a synchromesh first gear was in cars.
How many of you remember which car was first with a synchromesh low and what year that was?
No reason for it set anyone off. They still make both transmissions because there's a place for both and personal preference is an important factor for any of us. Yes, I much prefer the hydrostatic for the jobs I did with my own tractors, but I have a lot more hours on old gear models and for some jobs the gear models have a definite advantage.
I've not yet used a tractor with a synchromesh transmission, but figure that has to be a great improvement. I still remember what a great improvement a synchromesh first gear was in cars.
How many of you remember which car was first with a synchromesh low and what year that was?
Lazy
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
- Messages
- 527
- Location
- Missouri
- Tractor
- ford 1920 w/fel and bh, case 470, allis chalmers B 1937, JD 450 track loader, Case vac, 3 cub cadets ford lgt 125, Kubota 2230/60 inch mower.1948 farmall cub 1953 farmall cub
Hi
Bird I don't remember that but I remember having a 48 chevy with a vacuum shift when I was 16 and trying to speed shift it. I also like geared tractors, I work slow
Charlie
Bird I don't remember that but I remember having a 48 chevy with a vacuum shift when I was 16 and trying to speed shift it. I also like geared tractors, I work slow
Charlie
Bird
Rest in Peace
Yep, Charlie, my first car at age 16 was a '46 Chevy with the vacuum shift. I remember there being a "kit" or something to get rid of that vacuum shift, but I never did that to mine because from what I heard, they were bad to jump out of gear if you did.
