<font color="blue"> I don't think I've made excessive and/or mindless promotion of "your brand" statements. </font>
<font color="red"> "There's no question that the 4720 is far superior to the 5030 in every way". </font>
I do.
<font color="blue">I suggest you remove your "questionable" statement [regarding Kubota vs. JD hydro reliabilty) here as violation as well. </font>
I believe that the way I expressed my observations was reserved and reasonable, and based on what I consider to be empirical evidence and fairly extensive research into the question of the hydro reliablity of the two brands. Not only here, but on the rest of the internet, and in talking to many dealers. Either one brand or the other has to have a more reliable hydro. From looking at all the evidence available to me, I have concluded that that brand is Kubota. This is not mindless brand loyalty, it is merely one of the main reasons I bought a Kubota. Therefore, I stand by my comments and in no way see them as in violation of forum rules.
<font color="blue"> I can point you to several posts regarding the failure of mfg. to come up with a standard form of measurement for loaders. </font> Why bother, if<font color="blue"> what we see on this site and any other site is purely subjective information? </font> My observation is that there is a lot of information here that is very valuable and credible, and is the basis for much of my decision making process, a process that has led me to a very fine machine, the Kubota 5030HST. But as much as I like my tractor, I would stop far short of saying that "there's no question that the 5030 is far superior to the 4720 [or any other tractor] in every way". In many ways, for many people, a
BX2230 is "superior" to a 5030 in some ways. NO tractor is superior to ANY OTHER tractor in EVERY WAY.
<font color="blue"> So let's just say for arguments sake that the 3pt. and loader lift 10-20% more than the deere. Ok that's 1 point for the 5030. </font> How does this square with <font color="blue"> "there's no question that the 4720 is far superior to the 5030 in every way". </font>? Or <font color="blue"> The Deere will lift all the Kubota will </font> ?
<font color="blue"> Do you really need that extra [lift capacity]? </font>
You bet I do.
5030 "skidder" pics - the "tree-bota" in action The 2,400 lb. log being held in the 800-lb. Bradco grapple can attest to my desire to have all the lifting power I can get. I'd get a bigger loader if Kubota had a hydro machine to put it on. (And the bet still stands as far as I'm concerned - can your loader get 3,200 lbs. off the ground? Not stating as a fact that it can't, just betting $1,000 it can't).
<font color="blue">.... bigger fuel tank, but in your opinion that's only because it uses more fuel </font>
I never said the 4720 uses more fuel, because I don't know whether or not it does.
<font color="blue"> To me it still adds up to a superior tractor. To you it doesn't. </font>
"Superior" is very subjective, and neither tractor is flat-out "superior" to the other. Is Bach "superior" to Beethoven? Is BMW "superior" to Mercedes? They all have their strong points, and will appeal to different people for different reasons.
<font color="blue"> I don't think I've made excessive and/or mindless promotion of "your brand" statements. I state the 4720 is superior based on everything the tractor has and does not just picking and choosing which points are important and then the ones that my tractor doesn't win at saying they aren't important and a person doesn't need them.
</font>
I couldn't disagree more with this statement. I think that's very much what you are doing. I'd prefer we just rationally discuss the pro's and con's of each tractor and let the (unfortunate) readers of this thread decide what they want to buy, based on what THEY think is important.
Lastly, if you'd just back off from your statement "there's no question that the 4720 is far superior to the 5030 in every way", a statement and position which I feel is indefensible and patently, obviously and undeniably false, we might be able to put this behind us.