daTeacha
Veteran Member
Getting back to the $35 screen vs $200 side panel issue, I think you need to take into account that manufacturers often design things for easy assembly coming down the line. What costs you more as a part is probably because it saves them a few bucks at the initial building of the tractor. I have a daughter and son-in-law working in the engineering end of the automobile industry. Many of the things we think are incredibly stupid when it comes time to fix them result from designing for ease and speed of assembly while it's moving down the line. There is no conspiracy to sell parts, just to make it cheaper to build in the first place with little regard for repair needs. I'm not saying it's a good thing, but the bottom line is cost. That panel may allow a pretty good savings off the bottom line of a new tractor. Add in a dozen other little things and you can sell the tractor $100 cheaper than some other color and win a customer. And yes, they will do things differently to save as little as 5 cents per vehicle manufactured.
In today's world, manufacturers have to approach it with a backpacker mentality to survive the competition. Save an ounce here, an ounce there, another half ounce on another thing, and pretty soon you've shaved a pound or two or three off your load. You can walk just a little further, just a little faster, or carry something else.
In today's world, manufacturers have to approach it with a backpacker mentality to survive the competition. Save an ounce here, an ounce there, another half ounce on another thing, and pretty soon you've shaved a pound or two or three off your load. You can walk just a little further, just a little faster, or carry something else.