webbmeister
Gold Member
\"The House\" $40K paint job? $110K GC fee?
Well, we're getting down to the nitty gritty of why our dream house seems to have moved a little beyond reach. Without boring everyone with the details, we're aiming at 3350 square feet. We're getting wildly varying prices for particulars - but a couple really are jumping out at me.
For interior painting without ceilings (they are natural T&G pine throughout) the bids range from (what I consider to be) quite high to plain old outrageous. Low bid for this three bedroom home? $15K. High bid? $40K. For a General contracting fee, a low of $47K to a high of $111K.
I tell you, I'm ready to put up a pole barn and be done with it! On the high paint bid, I'm told that a crew of four men spends two days laying on primer and then two coats of latex. The way I see it, that's eight days of labor. Assume a very generous $1000 for materials, and that leaves $39,000 for labor. At the end of the day, that works out to $609.36 per hour per man!!!
I don't have the time to do much if any of the work or supervision myself. You guys in IT will understand why. Is there anyone on these boards who can tell me what a fair (win-win) rate might be for these two items? How are these rates derived? How is it that reputable union painters in my current city regularly are able to offer to re-paint (all that extra prep!) my current similarly sized house *with ceilings* for $4K to $4.5K? I asked the prospective GC who brought this bid pretty much the same question. He replied that "the paint is what you look at and my guy is really good." I really need help here. Am I missing something magical? Is there some huge difference between painting new construction and existing construction that I'm just not grasping? And the GC fee. It is a six-month project. Assuming this guy works only two jobs a year, (and I know he has several irons in the fire at any one time,) that's more for him each year than the President of the United States made until GW took office! Is this really what I should be expecting? Sorry to sound off.
If anyone cares to shed some light after that rant, I'd surely appreciate it!
Thanks,
Skeptical in Wheaton IL
(Jim)
Well, we're getting down to the nitty gritty of why our dream house seems to have moved a little beyond reach. Without boring everyone with the details, we're aiming at 3350 square feet. We're getting wildly varying prices for particulars - but a couple really are jumping out at me.
For interior painting without ceilings (they are natural T&G pine throughout) the bids range from (what I consider to be) quite high to plain old outrageous. Low bid for this three bedroom home? $15K. High bid? $40K. For a General contracting fee, a low of $47K to a high of $111K.
I tell you, I'm ready to put up a pole barn and be done with it! On the high paint bid, I'm told that a crew of four men spends two days laying on primer and then two coats of latex. The way I see it, that's eight days of labor. Assume a very generous $1000 for materials, and that leaves $39,000 for labor. At the end of the day, that works out to $609.36 per hour per man!!!
I don't have the time to do much if any of the work or supervision myself. You guys in IT will understand why. Is there anyone on these boards who can tell me what a fair (win-win) rate might be for these two items? How are these rates derived? How is it that reputable union painters in my current city regularly are able to offer to re-paint (all that extra prep!) my current similarly sized house *with ceilings* for $4K to $4.5K? I asked the prospective GC who brought this bid pretty much the same question. He replied that "the paint is what you look at and my guy is really good." I really need help here. Am I missing something magical? Is there some huge difference between painting new construction and existing construction that I'm just not grasping? And the GC fee. It is a six-month project. Assuming this guy works only two jobs a year, (and I know he has several irons in the fire at any one time,) that's more for him each year than the President of the United States made until GW took office! Is this really what I should be expecting? Sorry to sound off.
If anyone cares to shed some light after that rant, I'd surely appreciate it!
Thanks,
Skeptical in Wheaton IL
(Jim)