The most counterintuitive result ever!!!!

   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #1  

smstonypoint

Super Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
5,820
Location
SC (Upstate) & NC (Piedmont)
Tractor
NH TN 55, Kubota B2320 & RTV 900, Bad Boy Outlaw ZTR
Even if you are math-phobic, you should be able to answer this question.

Suppose you sum all the positive integers from 1 through infinity (1+2+3+............... ).

The answer is a really, really, really, really big number, right?

Well, no. I still haven't wrapped my mind around the idea, but the answer is -1/12.:confused2::confused2::confused2:

The proof is here:

[video]http://www.numberphile.com/videos/analytical_continuation1.html[/video]

Steve
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #2  
Proof? Hardly.

Conceptual Flaw: Infinity is a concept. Sum equations meant to go all the way to infinity are also a concept. They can't actually have a definitive answer, because one can never stop calculating them. Duh.

Math Flaw: that 1+1-1+1-1+1-... somehow equals 0.5. That's fake. The excuse is basically that it must equal 1 or 0 depending where you stop, and since we don't know where to stop we just average the two possible answers. Firstly, the equation requires, through the three little dots, that we don't ever finish it. It therefore does not have an answer. See "Conceptual Flaw" above. And even if it did, deciding to arrive at it just by averaging the two possibilities is completely arbitrary.

Proof Flaw: Everything he did afterwards to arrive at -1/12 is based off of the flawed 0.5 value.
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!!
  • Thread Starter
#3  
Proof? Hardly.

Conceptual Flaw: Infinity is a concept. Sum equations meant to go all the way to infinity are also a concept. They can't actually have a definitive answer, because one can never stop calculating them. Duh.

Math Flaw: that 1+1-1+1-1+1-... somehow equals 0.5. That's fake. The excuse is basically that it must equal 1 or 0 depending where you stop, and since we don't know where to stop we just average the two possible answers. Firstly, the equation requires, through the three little dots, that we don't ever finish it. It therefore does not have an answer. See "Conceptual Flaw" above. And even if it did, deciding to arrive at it just by averaging the two possibilities is completely arbitrary.

Proof Flaw: Everything he did afterwards to arrive at -1/12 is based off of the flawed 0.5 value.

The video presents an informal proof -- there is apparently a formal proof that the 0.5 value holds.

As the video indicates, the proof has implications that are important for "string theory." I have read a small amount about that theory -- enough that my brain aches when I even hear the term "string theory."

Steve
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #4  
Proof? Hardly.

Conceptual Flaw: Infinity is a concept. Sum equations meant to go all the way to infinity are also a concept. They can't actually have a definitive answer, because one can never stop calculating them. Duh.

Math Flaw: that 1+1-1+1-1+1-... somehow equals 0.5. That's fake. The excuse is basically that it must equal 1 or 0 depending where you stop, and since we don't know where to stop we just average the two possible answers. Firstly, the equation requires, through the three little dots, that we don't ever finish it. It therefore does not have an answer. See "Conceptual Flaw" above. And even if it did, deciding to arrive at it just by averaging the two possibilities is completely arbitrary.

Proof Flaw: Everything he did afterwards to arrive at -1/12 is based off of the flawed 0.5 value.

I don't buy it either. Seems like they are using real numbers to solve an unreal problem...or something...
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #5  
This is why theoretical physicist gets disproven. You can't just run the math in any direction to get the answer you want.
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #6  
The video presents an informal proof -- there is apparently a formal proof that the 0.5 value holds.

As the video indicates, the proof has implications that are important for "string theory." I have read a small amount about that theory -- enough that my brain aches when I even hear the term "string theory."

Steve

I find the string theory quite intriguing...on a basic layman's scale it is not difficult to comprehend...

Here is a page that gives some basics on just how small a "string" is...
NOVA | A Sense of Scale: String Theory

If an atom were magnified to the size of the solar system, a string would be the size of a tree

launch the interactive slideshow...
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #7  
Do you want 10,000 or a start with a penny and double everyday for 30 days ?
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #8  
I'm good at math until it starts to lose all correspondence to reality. If you want to disprove the "proof," just add one golf ball to another forever, and see if at any point you have one twelfth of a golf ball.
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #9  
I'm good at math until it starts to lose all correspondence to reality. If you want to disprove the "proof," just add one golf ball to another forever, and see if at any point you have one twelfth of a golf ball.

You'd have negative 1/12 of a golf ball. Do that 12 times and you owe me a golf ball. Should I send you my address?
 
   / The most counterintuitive result ever!!!! #10  
You'd have negative 1/12 of a golf ball. Do that 12 times and you owe me a golf ball. Should I send you my address?

Yes. I'll send it in 12 separate negative packages.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

1613 (A49339)
1613 (A49339)
2009 Peterbilt 384 T/A Day Cab Truck Tractor (A46683)
2009 Peterbilt 384...
2003 VIKING  CEMENT MIXING TRAILER (A45333)
2003 VIKING...
2100 (A46502)
2100 (A46502)
2015 Scag Cheetah (A47307)
2015 Scag Cheetah...
2021 New Holland P2350 Air Cart  New, Tow-Between, Intellirate Control, Dual Tires (A48561)
2021 New Holland...
 
Top