The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP

   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #51  
Let me try to be objective to some of your subjective comments.

Groundrule 1-I agree with

Groundrule 2-This is a joke right? You can't say in anyway shape or form that all of the top three are even close in price.

Groundrule 3- This is a joke right? A good dealer out weighs alot in a buying decision.

Groundrule 4- This is a joke right? What is comfortable for me being 5-8 might not be to someone 6-4. Also to each person control comfort is different.

So far as I see it we have one groundrule, groundrule number 1.

So lets continue. If you believe the marketing numbers from the builders then you need a wake up call. It's called marketing and the numbers game. If you want the true numbers you should pay for the reports. http://tractortestlab.unl.edu/ I do believe you will be surprized at the real numbers for each tractor. All tests preformed the same. Unlike the manufacturers razzle dazzle.

Number 1-2-4-see above

Number 3 can't comment haven't used all three
Number 5 mounting time with a bradco is about 5 min with a subframe mount. My friend has a 3410 and a bradco hoe This is fact.
Number 6 Should??? Isn't that subjective.
Number 7 JD sounds like the upper hand on this one
Number 8 JD sounds like the upper hand on this one
Number 9 This only would matter to a tall person.
Number 10 Springiest?? bounce down the road-hummmm
Number 11 Is the JD quick disc. the same as the skidsteer so any attachment can be used? If not this is helpfull but not the best thing since sliced bread. I would rather spend the 300 and have the ability to use any skidsteer attachment.
Number 12 Totally subjective comfortable for one is not for another
Number 13 Great if you want the mid I have no use for it as well as alot of others
Number 14 Expert opinion?? Yup an opinion everyone has one. What is a tractor expert. One who spends hours and hours operating each tractor. Does he do this. One who has been to school on tractors. Or does he do as alot of others go by the razzle dazzle of the sales literature. Or by the Nebraska tests? NO disrespect here To Mr. Chishti but with out knowing his credentials can we say he is an expert?

Ok after going over your post there is alot left out of the real deal. What comes standard on each tractor? As opposed to having to get options which add up in price.

If your going to have an objective test using numbers then you shouldn't use subjective numbers.

What about brake steering on all of these models? Mid pto is not useful to me but brake steering is. What about remotes on each tractor, Draft control, cabs and transmissions??? Guess what is important to one objectively isn't to another.

Not to beat you up Glenn, but to me your post wasn't very objective. So beat me up if you wish with your reply. I've been to handlin school I can handle it.

Gordon

8-41268-jgforestrytractor.jpg
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #52  
Well here goes,Fact the b-21 is too light for my needs per 2 rentals.Fact -the J.D.4200 makes me feel all fuzzy inside!Fact-2410 and 2710 although great units just didnt have enough butt for my needs.fact-never looked at N/H too far away Mckinney Tx.I know you can through out all my 2 cents cause of all them rules but i have Deere+Bota yr.2000 pamplets in front of me.The gross weight is not listed on the Botas.Very interesting though even to a bare-foot-ridge-runner like me.Fact-J.D.gives ya a place ta put yer spitcan!There ya go!
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #53  
Kerr,

Not familiar with "ridgespeak".

Is "all fuzzy inside" a good thing, ...or a bad thing? /w3tcompact/icons/tongue.gif

Larry /w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP
  • Thread Starter
#54  
Matt and Gordon. One, two, Pow, pow. Way to go guys.

Matt, please please tell us where and how you got the vibration, noise and pedal pressure numbers. What do the vibration measurements mean (higher is worse?).

Now we're starting to cook. Hey, Orange and Blue, some of the JD objective specs you're not going to be able to rebut. So take Matt's lead and find objective things that are superior to Deere on your brands. The Deere underbelly may be showing. Think hydro comparisons. Think pedal placement. Think pedal pressure. Think reliability. Tell us what you think!

And by the way, you disgruntled and disappointed JD owners who we all know are out there, you are respectfully invited to fess up. Notwithstanding some specs and measurements in your tractor's favor, please tell us and our Jeffersonian posterity what is wrong with your tractors or what you don't like--in our search for objective truth.
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #55  
Gordon,
I'd have to disagree with you on that one. All three when I was shopping were close in price. I got a better deal on a deere than a kubota. Alot of people report the opposite. I think there is a ton of markup on these tractors and it just depends on where you are that makes the deal. The Kubota dealer told me that they only had a 30% markup, JD said 40% so I don't know. If the 4610 had been less money I would have been driving it. I couldn't get near the deal on it that I could the 4600.

18-35034-TRACTO~1.GIF
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #56  
Glenn, Pow Pow thats it----hummmm something is wrong here. I must have hit a homerun with my last post if that is all you have to come back with.

Are you really looking to trade the Kubota and buy a Deere? If so just do it. Any of the top three are well made some better than others thats all. The bottom line is that your happy with what tractor you end up with in the barn. That is all there is to it.

But remember when comparing numbers, make sure your comparing apples to apples thats all. Or in my case oranges to oranges./w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif
Gordon

8-41268-jgforestrytractor.jpg
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP
  • Thread Starter
#57  
Gordon,

It would be helpful if you could point out the specific test results you think rebut the statistics we have been quoting in JD's favor. The Nebraska tests seem to focus on large ag tractors.

The groundrules were intended to focus the discussion on objective meaurements and performance specs. We all understand that the ultimate buying decision will include price, dealer considerations, and a whole host of subjective and "feel" factors.

This, however, is the Joe Friday thread: "Just trying to get the facts, Mam."
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #58  
Glenn,

<font color=blue>"Just trying to get the facts, Mam."</font color=blue>

I don't think you give a rats .... what the facts are, you are just having fun trying to do something your good at, stirring the pot. Without conflict we wouldn't need lawyers.

Al
 
   / The Objective Superiority of JD in 32-46 HP #60  
Glenmac:
I personally don't know how the 4560 kubota backhoe attaches. I believe it is a 4 pt mount system but remain uncertain. 4pt mount systems are quite fast to attach. My Bradco is a 4pt system and mounts in a few minutes.

In addition, it is not fair to compare the smaller 4690 hoe to the JD 48. The 4690 is also designed for the B series which are overall smaller in size and hp than the 4300 and larger tractors.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2008 DRAGON 150 BBL ALUMINUM VACUUM TRAILER (A55745)
2008 DRAGON 150...
2015 Komatsu PC138 (A47477)
2015 Komatsu PC138...
2017 VOLVO EC160EL EXCAVATOR (A52707)
2017 VOLVO EC160EL...
2018 HINO 195 16FT BOX TRUCK (A56129)
2018 HINO 195 16FT...
CATERPILLAR CP-563D PADFOOT ROLLER (A52707)
CATERPILLAR...
2006 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 4X4 PICKUP TRUCK (A52141)
2006 CHEVROLET...
 
Top