namesray
Platinum Member
This year I have been fighting mud on the fire wood logs I have been skidding out. It seems my fransgard winch isn't designed well for "skidding". It does great on "winching" the logs to the road, but I have always struggled finding the best method for "skidding" the logs to the landing, especially this year with all the mud. I have been sharpening the chainsaws constantly, as the logs get caked with mud. The factory design of the winch states to use the lower "tow bar" to hook the chains into and DO NOT use the cable for skidding. ok, but leaving the logs on the "tow bar" keeps them too close to the ground and thus the mud.
So next, I left the logs on the cable, and raised the butt ends up to the "dozer/anchor blade" at the bottom of the winch. (dozer/anchor blade is designed to place butt end of the logs against). doing this helped, but still after raising the 3ph to its fullest height, the logs are still too close to the mud.
Then, I started cutting the logs shorter (10ft lengths) to raise the angle of the log off the ground more. this worked "better" but was so inefficient as I spent so much time preparing the logs instead of just getting them to the landing.
So now to my point/question. The other day I started winching the logs all the way up to the upper part of the winch. above the dozer/anchor blade. This seemed to work great! However the winch is not designed to have a butt end of a log "banging" into this area. All the moving components of the winch are attached in this upper area, such as the drive shaft, and am concerned that one too many "bangs" in this area will bend the "frame work" for these moving parts and ruin the winch.
I am considering of attaching an upper skidding plate in this upper area of the winch to protect the frame work and moving parts. My theory is using a 10" I beam, placed vertical, welded on each side of the I beam to the winch. The gap behind the I beam would keep the log banging off the actual winch framework and the area of impact would be absorbed over a larger area= the welded area of the I beam where it attaches to the winch.
Any thoughts or suggestions??
So next, I left the logs on the cable, and raised the butt ends up to the "dozer/anchor blade" at the bottom of the winch. (dozer/anchor blade is designed to place butt end of the logs against). doing this helped, but still after raising the 3ph to its fullest height, the logs are still too close to the mud.
Then, I started cutting the logs shorter (10ft lengths) to raise the angle of the log off the ground more. this worked "better" but was so inefficient as I spent so much time preparing the logs instead of just getting them to the landing.
So now to my point/question. The other day I started winching the logs all the way up to the upper part of the winch. above the dozer/anchor blade. This seemed to work great! However the winch is not designed to have a butt end of a log "banging" into this area. All the moving components of the winch are attached in this upper area, such as the drive shaft, and am concerned that one too many "bangs" in this area will bend the "frame work" for these moving parts and ruin the winch.
I am considering of attaching an upper skidding plate in this upper area of the winch to protect the frame work and moving parts. My theory is using a 10" I beam, placed vertical, welded on each side of the I beam to the winch. The gap behind the I beam would keep the log banging off the actual winch framework and the area of impact would be absorbed over a larger area= the welded area of the I beam where it attaches to the winch.
Any thoughts or suggestions??