TractorGunn
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2024
- Messages
- 159
- Location
- Rogersville, MO
- Tractor
- LS MT242HE, John Deere X300, Husqvarna MZT61
I'll be doing lots of brush hogging, maintaining about 2000' of gravel road via box blade. Will also be doing some discing, tilling, rock rake &c.While I have all forms of weight.....fluid in the tires, wheel weights, and heavy implements. Ballast/counterweight is based on needs.
Ballast in the tires alone is not enough for doing alot of loader work.
Tire ballast/wheel weights are also not enough for loader work.
Both are great for ground engaging rear implements. Like a disc, box blade, rear blade, etc. Because when in use....the weight of the implement is not on the tractor but on the ground. This makes your tractor light in the rear and easy to spin out due to lack of traction/weight.
A heavy rear implement is a far better match for front loader work....without the added cost of ballast in the tire or wheel weights.
If you don't plan on much in the way of heavy rear ground engaging implements....I'd honestly skip the hassle and go with weight on the 3PH.
Only if you plan on plowing, discing, or dragging around a blade.....then loaded tires can be of benefit
I'll look into adding weight at the 3PH. This is all new to me, any advice or knowledge is appreciated.