Unless you're reading some sort of subliminal message not available to the rest of us, "the whole point of this thread" was/is to determine who is #3 and who is #5 on the list, NOT who is #1, and/or #2. (Re-read post #1) Let's not start making up things as we go along. Stick with facts. Don't invent an answer and then make up a question that fits YOUR answer.
Even at that, with an unknown in TWO spots in this top five, and the numbers associated with those 2 others aren't available as of now, it's entirely possible that AGCO could possibly fit in EITHER slot. And THAT question, the one asked by the O.P., still remains at this juncture. Your "I think, therefore I know" logic has a GIANT flaw.
There is a strong likelyhood that AGCO is #3, but until such a time as hard evidence is prsented, it's just a guess on the part of ALL of us.
While those numbers MAY be accurate, they're just as likely skewed to a degree. (not scew, which isn't even a real word, with the possible exception of those appearing in your subliminal messages)
Thank for the English lesson.
Ever hear the old saying; "Figures lie because liars figure"?
The relative size of any of these manufacturers, by any measure, has little or nothing to do with the viability of the entity or quality or usefulness of any of their products related to others. What order they are listed in matters not a bit to me.
Nope, never heard of it but I doesn't really make sense either.
I understand that the relative size doesn't equate quality or usefulness but it was a interesting topic of conversation.