I've wanted to play with charts on the "numbers" program on my MAC so...
For the graphs and averages, I had to kick out 3 replies because they had huge acreages: D7E, Spudland_Dave's family farm, and zythinl. Nothing personal, you guys just are doing it big time and make the graphs look funny.
I had to kick out Edward.S because he has an insane amount of HP (714) on "just" 80 acres (and I think we are all insanely jealous of anyone with that much HP).
The Averages:
Average Acres is 66, Average HP was 116, average HP/Acre was 16.
The enclosed .pdf has two X-Y plots. The X axis looks logarithmic even though it's not. So each bar is a response, and the axis number labels try to fit the range in a very general sense.
The Graphs:
The top chart is acres on the x axis, and total HP on the Y. It's nice to see that people like HP no matter how much land they have :thumbsup:. People with _lots_ of land tend to have more tractors and HP. One guy at around 6 acres shows there is no such think as too much HP and should be admired for bucking the trend and standing out in a crowd :laughing:.
The bottom chart is HP/Acre vs. Acres. There is a somewhat of a trend here. The X axis is acreage, the Y is HP/Acre. So generally speaking, as you get more land your HP/Acre goes down. I had to limit the Y axis to 40 which clipped a few admirable HP loving people off at the knees.
The Conclusion:
So there you go. I'm missing Excel here, the 1st time I've missed a Microsoft produce since jumping ship to the MAC a year ago. You've got averages and plots. The plots are cherry picked data kicking out anything that made the plots not look purty. Something about lies, **** lies, and statistics :confused2:.
My conclusion is there is no such thing as too much HP, too much land, or too much seat time.
Pete