Thanks very much everyone. Really great feedback.
I went to the Kubota dealer yesterday to have another look at the L4701 and to see what we could do on the bottom line with our 2 tractors for trade. There were many line items on the quote so he just wanted to make sure everything was needed. He gave some similar advice in going for the MX5200. I want to say list on it is about $1000 more than the L4701 and like it has been mentioned, is a much beefier tractor.
MX has the same BH92 backhoe but with the next sized up loader.
I've come to agree the 3046R doesn't have enough lifting power. The L4701 is very close. The MX can do the job.
I was curious as to why he was pushing the MX5200 rather than the MX4800 until I went out the lot. They have one L4701, one MX4800 and at least 10 MX5200's.
I've started work on a quote for an MX and I'm also going to give the 4052M a look.
Thanks!
I went to the Kubota dealer yesterday to have another look at the L4701 and to see what we could do on the bottom line with our 2 tractors for trade. There were many line items on the quote so he just wanted to make sure everything was needed. He gave some similar advice in going for the MX5200. I want to say list on it is about $1000 more than the L4701 and like it has been mentioned, is a much beefier tractor.
MX has the same BH92 backhoe but with the next sized up loader.
I've come to agree the 3046R doesn't have enough lifting power. The L4701 is very close. The MX can do the job.
I was curious as to why he was pushing the MX5200 rather than the MX4800 until I went out the lot. They have one L4701, one MX4800 and at least 10 MX5200's.
I've started work on a quote for an MX and I'm also going to give the 4052M a look.
Thanks!