Tractors and (upcoming) tariffs?

[LouNY]

Everyone has an opinion. The facts are that Congress totally controls agency funding, mission, accountability, and accomplishments. There’s nothing illegal about an agency executing the missions that Congress has directed by law. And when/if there is an overstepping of authority, the courts typically remedy the situation, and/or Congress deals with it. There are plenty of successful court challenges that rescind agency decisions. But the facts are that there are legal requirements established by Congress for any rule making and all are published daily in the federal register. Nothing is developed without the legal processes directed by laws established by Congress. Don’t believe the people who state otherwise; they don’t know what they’re talking about. Agencies operate to execute laws passed by congress.

Agencies operate to execute regulations developed by themselves for themselves.

 

[jyoutz]

Agencies operate to execute regulations developed by themselves for themselves.

Your opinion. Congress knows differently and secretaries report to congressional committees very frequently. Even though agencies are executive branch, Congress sets the rules, mission and funding and is very involved. Most agency work is a result of congressional directives, more so than executive orders.

 

[LouNY]

It most certainly is my opinion and it's fairly plain and simple not full of hot air and hiding behind bureaucratizes and their double talk and misrepresentation.

 

[jyoutz]

It most certainly is my opinion and it's fairly plain and simple not full of hot air and hiding behind bureaucratizes and their double talk and misrepresentation.

Congress is well aware of agency operations, talks with secretaries often, and can and does direct agency operations by laws and funding. They also pass and rescind laws to achieve their objectives. This is how it actually works. Believe what you want.

 

[Fixastuff]

What I think is funny is the older people who got everything they could while working for .gov and retired.

It seems like they don’t want the younger gen to get what they did and have a burn it all down it wont affect me attitude.

 

[jyoutz]

What I think is funny is the older people who got everything they could while working for .gov and retired.

It seems like they don’t want the younger gen to get what they did and have a burn it all down it wont affect me attitude.

Not only older people who worked for .gov. Many older people in general seem to be ok with dismantling social security and other things for younger people, even though they enjoyed those things themselves.

 

[LouNY]

I guess it's time to unwatch this thread so as not to see governmental pigeons patting themselves on the back.

 

[CloverKnollFarms]

I think SS will dismantle itself given a little time, that’s the issue

 

[jyoutz]

I think SS will dismantle itself given a little time, that’s the issue

It doesn’t have to happen. There are changes that can be made to ensure solvency. But no serious proposals to address the situation.

 

[jyoutz]

I guess it's time to unwatch this thread so as not to see governmental pigeons patting themselves on the back.

Responding with facts to rebut fake news isn’t back patting.