My question to some of the gentlemen who believe the reason of intercoolers are for increasing molecules of air for increased HP; why wouldn't the manufactures save money by increasing the size of the fuel injectors only, and getting the same results?? I assume that others have done this to their diesel engines, and save money without damaging their engines? I know turbos are added for power and truly aid in higher altitudes for the same reason. Is the cost of a bigger engine/tractor greater than a less tractor with a turbo? Seems to me more weight would be wanted? What is the HP gain for the same displacement engine; turbo vs non turbo in % or net gain HP? Maybe the "chip route" to the tractor engine is possible as a money saving alternative also? I have not followed the tractor market for turbo engines on smaller tractors. Or are the manufactures targeting Colorado and the higher Great Plains region with smaller turbos?