Egon
Epic Contributor
If there is a constant water supply all the system needs is one main pump whose discharge is pressure regulated ( different ways to do that ) and a pressure regulator at each individual service point.
I keep getting this gut feeling that this organization is poorly monitored. I doubt anyone knows how each user is equipped. So what we have is an "every man for himself" situation. Those in power probably know this. Some of those in power probably have systems that everybody else would oppose. But they have good water pressure/flow. This organization is going to implode. There's going to be much gnashing of teeth....
Personally, I would go with the storage tank for no other reason then this........Very prophetic. There is a lot of animosity between the board and residents on the upper end of the neighborhood mostly because they are incompetent and arrogant. I honestly have not met people (the board) who were so sure they were right but were so wrong. One example is at one point one of the pumps got so hot it melted the PVC but rather than ask the question why did the pump get hot they just decided to put in metal pipe and proceeded to burn up a $5000 pump. Long story short, the upper end used to have adequate pressure until the construction of 6-8 new homes. Now the board wants to pretend the issue doesn't exist. Mostly I think because it would be very costly to correct. To compound matters the Pres and Treasurer are husband and wife but refuse the conflict of interest despite the fact that the husband is a lawyer.
At this point I am tired of arguing with them and just want to get adequate pressure. I am trying to determine if I need the storage tank or can I just hook the pump directly up to the water company. My fear is that if i try to boost the input pressure I am receiving from the neighborhood from 40 (I actually had 30 PSI at the house today) to say 60 I am afraid I would suck the input pipe dry or severely reduce the pressure for my neighbors, which I don't want to do, anytime the pump kicked on. That is why I initially purchased the water tank. However I do have concerns of maintaining water quality in the tank so if it isn't needed I would just assume not use it. Thanks again for all the replies.
Personally, I would go with the storage tank for no other reason then this........
The current system is inadequate, not properly maintained and the overseers dont care. This means as time goes on issues are going to get worse and your water service WILL be interrupted.
From burned up pumps, different pipes or connections, check valves, and others using booster pumps, your service will be affected until you get overseers that care. Which may be never.
Length of interruption will probably be days or weeks as the overseers are incompetent.
At least with your tank, you will have a few days to a week worth of water on site.
Yes, float valve is the way to go. I think earlier discussions included having the tank auto fill with a float valve.Add a float valve. As you use water the system will automatically refiil your supply. Doesn't matter at what pressure or flow rate. With this system it wouldn't require a huge tank. 500 gallons per day useage would equal 15K per month. A 500 gallon tank would easily keep up since it's always refilling. If your useage is a lot more just increase the tank size.
This method also makes you a good neighbor who isn't causing your neighbors problems.
Add a float valve. As you use water the system will automatically refiil your supply. Doesn't matter at what pressure or flow rate. With this system it wouldn't require a huge tank. 500 gallons per day useage would equal 15K per month. A 500 gallon tank would easily keep up since it's always refilling. If your useage is a lot more just increase the tank size.
This method also makes you a good neighbor who isn't causing your neighbors problems.