Soundguy
Old Timer
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Messages
- 51,575
- Location
- Central florida
- Tractor
- RK 55HC,ym1700, NH7610S, Ford 8N, 2N, NAA, 660, 850 x2, 541, 950, 941D, 951, 2000, 3000, 4000, 4600, 5000, 740, IH 'C' 'H', CUB, John Deere 'B', allis 'G', case VAC
I wonder if there is a similar tractor with similar rear housing in CI that you could compair weight specs / lift specs to?
My first guess is this was a bean counter move.. I.E., they figured what it should carry.. reversed engineered the system to only carry that weight.. saved 3 cents in overall cost, and in the end, left the tractor design with a working lift casting that is up to 'specs'... but doesn't exceede them, like a ci casting 'might'.
There may also be other variables.. like thickness.. and heat disipation..e tc.
IMHO.. I'd want iron or steel back there.... I work with heavy equipment every day.. and none of our big yellow equipment is using aluminum castings in weight bearing members.. though quite a few gear cases covers are cast aluminum.. while the transfer cases themselves are CI.. etc.
Soundguy
Soundguy
My first guess is this was a bean counter move.. I.E., they figured what it should carry.. reversed engineered the system to only carry that weight.. saved 3 cents in overall cost, and in the end, left the tractor design with a working lift casting that is up to 'specs'... but doesn't exceede them, like a ci casting 'might'.
There may also be other variables.. like thickness.. and heat disipation..e tc.
IMHO.. I'd want iron or steel back there.... I work with heavy equipment every day.. and none of our big yellow equipment is using aluminum castings in weight bearing members.. though quite a few gear cases covers are cast aluminum.. while the transfer cases themselves are CI.. etc.
Soundguy
Soundguy
