tulenutn2o
Platinum Member
I bought a new truck last year to replace my 94 ranger with 250,000 miles on it. Used no oil and had not required anything other than general maintence and wear items such as, starter, brakes, alt, belts. And yes, I bought another ranger.( this is a parts chaser). What I wanted was the simplest, most reasonably priced, proven vehicle I could get. I do not like the electronics in any new vehicle. Takes the ability of the average shade tree mechanic to fix something on the road. My old 77 f150 4x4 with 400, 4 spd gets 14.5 mpg and has power to pull, whereas the 5.4 powered truck gets 13 and couldn't pull me off a bar stool. Frankly, the only option I ever require is a/c. But try finding a vehicle with only that option without special order at big $$$. For the record, I have little faith that this 09 ranger will surpass, or even measure up to the longevity of the 94. I didn't even consider GM, partly because of the Bankruptsy issue, and because I have seen too many electrical part failures, etc. I have seen how well our government runs things, now they have a hand in GM, scary times, indeed.