2549
Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2011
- Messages
- 26
- Tractor
- JD790 2WD
Toyota. Stickshift. Single malts. Designated hitter. Coke.
Spot on.True enough but perhaps more importantly one of them will do a given amount of work , say plow an acre, with less fuel then the other. Not having read all the previous threads I'm guessing that advantage goes to the gear type transmission. The question is does the improved control the operator has with the hydrostatic transmission justify whatever extra fuel is consumed? For a machine working in tight places and on uneven ground that is probably a yes but for large Ag tractors pulling as wide as can be had to the horizon and back probably not.
If money were no object and I had a lot of snow to move, I would get one of those tractors with a cab, loader and HST, the setup a loader mounted snowblower (with a 3 point powerpack) and a loader mounted plow.My heaviest use is snow plowing a 2 mile length of road where at times snow gets very heavy. I plan on doing it with a blade on the loader boom as opposed to blower for time reasons. I currently do it with a pickup and it is really tough on the truck. I need to be able to maintain some speed to throw the snow over the bank which means I will be asking alot of the trans. I don't want to over heat and damage it. My tractor considerations are either Kubota L5740 or M7040. I want to use a 9' or so blade and am concerned about having enough hp and proper transmission to keep it moving.