... to me the best strategy is to buy the lowest HP in a vendors tractor class.
With the CK27, you are getting the same hydraulic pump as the CK30 or CK35 and also everything else except the diesel engine is identical.
The CK27 will burn a lot less fuel than its larger engine CK brothers. However it will not move quite as quickly as them but not something you would never be able to notice unless
you are hopping on and off to compare
them all the time. Hydraulic power specs are all the same.
IMHO, if you are sure a CK model suits your individual tractoring requirements, I'd just try to get the best price on any CK model that you can and that will probably be a CK27. If you need a larger tractor don't buy a CK at all.
... to me the best strategy is to buy the lowest HP in a vendors tractor class.
With the CK27, you are getting the same hydraulic pump as the CK30 or CK35 and also everything else except the diesel engine is identical.
The CK27 will burn a lot less fuel than its larger engine CK brothers. However it will not move quite as quickly as them but not something you would never be able to notice unless
you are hopping on and off to compare
them all the time. Hydraulic power specs are all the same.
IMHO, if you are sure a CK model suits your individual tractoring requirements, I'd just try to get the best price on any CK model that you can and that will probably be a CK27. If you need a larger tractor don't buy a CK at all.
I haven't priced these tractors recently. I'd pay a bit more for more HP but what you really need to decide is what frame size you can work with and afford. CK20 will do a lot of (most) of the tasks that the larger CKs will do but with one foot smaller implements. If space is limited the CK20 is a great tractor. The CK27/30/35 are bigger frames but basically the same loader capacity and relatively small differences in work output. I don't know what the current difference in price is between a CK35 and a DK40 but there is a big difference in overall work capacity between the two. I'd certainly pay an extra 2K if the difference is that small to move from a CK35 to a DK40 if my property could handle the larger frame size.
Dealer told me it's roughly $1k difference between a CK35 and DK40.
And that my friend is a no brainer decision. For me, even $2K would be hard to turn down for the upgrade. Only exception would be if you just cannot handle the size. The DK is more tractor in every conceivable way including heavier and taking up more space. All other attributes are positive. It is a newer design, considerably more capable, and, it is a much more comfortable tractor to operate.Dealer told me it's roughly $1k difference between a CK35 and DK40.
My view is the CK 27 may use slightly less fuel per hour.The CK27 will burn a lot less fuel than its larger engine CK brothers. However it will not move quite as quickly
Not to discredit your theory but, I had a CK25 HST and found it had a problem with the snowblower, so, I upgraded to the 35 and the problem went away.
The point being, if loader power is the desire, then your idea has merit. But if you're after pto power then the highest hp in the class would be the logical choice.
Dealer told me it's roughly $1k difference between a CK35 and DK40.