polo1665
Veteran Member
Content is one of the most important indicators about the accuracy of any information which is given, but that's the point I was trying to make.
Consensus may seem like a good indicator, but it isn't very reliable because of many things, including what I call the "sheeple effect". Time and time again, I've seen a forum thread where people would be responding with a variety of different advice/opinions, until someone comes along and says something that changes the entire course of the thread. Suddenly, the responses all seem to be offshoots of that one response, as if everyone suddenly had the same idea, which is highly unlikely.
That's not necessarily true. The content of someones post (first or otherwise) can speak volumes about them. Is it well written? Is it clear and easy to read? Is it full of spelling and grammar errors? Did they include enough information? Does it actually make sense?
Generally speaking, I don't like to name members specifically, but since you mentioned Soundguy, who happens to be the current top poster on TBN, I'll say that he definitely knows his stuff. However, he is the exception, rather than the rule.
Comradery is a good thing, but only to a certain extent. Too much comradery and you end up with Facebook. Too little comradery and the site becomes dull and uninteresting. The key is finding the right balance between the two. It's safe to say that most people come to a site like TBN looking for information, so it stands to reason that information should be more important than comradery. More wheat, less chaff.
That's understandable, because it's very easy for post counts and membership dates to be misleading about the quality of any information provided, but content is always king.
I think we agree on most points here, but be careful about mentioning spelling and grammar errors in the same paragraph with the name Soundguy. He gets touchy about that:laughing::laughing: