arrow
Super Member
My first truck went over 200,000 before it needed a clutch, while my last track toy needed a clutch every third weekend. It depends on how you use. Luddites fear industrial change and specifically, technological change. If my intent was to call people pushing back against a CVT or HST transmission, small-minded, I would have selected a different word.
At any-rate, while possible, long intervals between clutch changes are not normative unless the machine is under-utililized in its capacity to work or sits around.
That said, it is easier to use a CVT or HST transmission.
No one was pushing back on alternative motion methods. It was you pushing back on geared machines and for the novice, an unfair assessment as it was coming from only your view point. Others thought to chime in as a result of your one sided argument which several here thought erroneous. . I do not agree with your statement that long clutch life is not the norm. I expect and what I've seen is a clutch to last the life of the tractor. Your statement is like saying all of your teeth will need to be pulled out of your head by the time your 70. May have been true in the 40's and 50's but like clutches, teeth should last the life of the owner.
The information here comes colored as a result of varied experiences. Your assessment was particularly so and obviously rather limited in scope. Your opinion is just that…yours; but you come across as the end all be all of information which can give false impressions to the people attempting to learn something here for their own sakes. You can say anything that has an engine is a "ticking time bomb". By the way, the word "Luddite" can certainly pertain to being a small minded individual resisting progress.. Either way, it was a definite slight dig to those thinking differently from you. Totally unnecessary and not necessarily truthful as well.
Last edited: