cp1969-
I'm sorry you interpret the sarcasm of my last post as being "uncivil." I think the "lack of civility" gauntlet was thrown down LONG BEFORE I ever jumped in. Just guess I'm fed up with what I see as attacks on those who I believe are honest individuals trying to educate others as to their witnessing coyote attacks.
I guess the one major difference I see between my "brand" of sarcasm and others is that I use facts to support my arguments in addition to the negative tone where I have seen only negative tone and lack of logical argument flow as posted by others. (including yourself.) Is negative tone required to make a logical point? Not at all. But, as I stated earlier, **I** didn't let "that genie out of the bottle." Although I didn't start it, I sure ain’t gonna sit down and take it either. As Popeye says, "I's had all I can stands, I can't stands no more!"
Since you asked for it, I'll illustrate this using your own words as much as possible and try to limit my own since you are unable/unwilling to deal with sarcasm (although I believe you have dished out plenty yourself). Not sure why, as it seems EdKing, Cowboydoc, & others have been attacked far more viciously, but fair enough, I'll put on the "kid gloves" so you don't "feel threatened" and "exit stage left." Hopefully it will meet with your approval since you now have stated your willingness to withdraw from the discussion unless I “play nice.”
<font color=blue>Nowhere in this thread did I call you or anyone else in this thread a liar. All I said was that my experience was different from yours.</font color=blue>
You stated:
<font color=blue>I'm not saying your experience isn't true--all I'm saying is that it is definitely not the way I have found coyotes to behave in my neck of the woods. </font color=blue>
<font color=blue>As I said, about the only conclusion that will be reached in this discussion is that coyotes' behavior apparently varies considerably with geographic location.</font color=blue>
<font color=blue>I'm willing to believe that coyote behavior could very well be different where you live, but don't try to tell me that's how they are around here, because they aren't.</font color=blue> (inflection added)
/w3tcompact/icons/hmm.gif Ok, so it appears that you are saying those here may not be liars, but your "local" coyotes could never conduct themselves in any such way. On the surface, this appears to support your argument that you "never called anyone here a liar." But let's step back and look at the other comments you have posted for a second.
Comments from earlier posts of yours:
<font color=blue>Why do you want to 'cut their numbers as much as possible?' What do they hurt?</font color=blue> - implied doubt as to there being any "real" issue.
<font color=blue>I wonder if all these livestock killings were witnessed or if tracks were found by a carcass--then I have to wonder how many people can tell a coyote track from a dog track.</font color=blue> - implied ignorance of observers and implied doubt as to actual viewing of events
<font color=blue>You witnessed it or your neighbor told you he did? </font color=blue> - implication of subterfuge of another poster on this thread
<font color=blue>Not once did I find a person who claimed he'd actually seen it, except from persons who were in my opinion blowhards or known liars </font color=blue> - implication that those who report seeing such attacks are liars (general stereotype - e.g. posts from others on this board were not specifically excluded from this comment).
<font color=blue>And you expect me to disregard that body of evidence and accept on someone's internet say-so that coyotes' behavior as an entire group is to routinely prey on livestock? Sorry--ain't gonna happen. </font color=blue> - denial of testimony from other posts on this thread, implication of deceit of others on this thread - e.g. calling them liars
To me, at least, all of these statements reflect a common thread of: (1) doubt that any real issue exists, and (2) deceit/subterfuge from others who posted their eyewitness accounts of attacks within this thread. (e.g. they are liars)
So, which is it? /w3tcompact/icons/hmm.gif Seems like an oxymoron to me. Either coyotes, under the right circumstance, can/will attack livestock or they will not. Either those who have posted their eyewitness accounts are telling the truth and yes, even your locally "nice" coyotes, under the right circumstances, will attack livestock/deer, OR they will not and all those who have posted said experiences are guilty of deceit/lies.
I've already stated my position, and don't feel I've been "wishy-washy" in my beliefs/support of the others who have posted. Since your posts seem to go "both ways", settle up and state it clearly/concisely - what do you believe? Liars or honest individuals? Pick a side and leave the politics out of "riding the fence." If you're willing to do that, I'll quit “picking on you.”