Why 4 Wheel Drive

   / Why 4 Wheel Drive #101  
This thread has gotten real interesting and I always enjoy these types of debates:D

I agree with most of what spyderlk said and even some of what Jasg said.

After following this thread for a few days, here is my understanding of what everyone is trying to say.

Jasg: I think you are trying to emphasize that a tractor CANNOT flip backwards if hooked to the drawbar. I'll agree with this because it is true that the rears will break traction before a flip can happen, BUT...the fronts can come up a foot or so, as explained in one of the links with the remote controlled tractors. Which leads me to Spyderlk's position.

Spyderlk: Correct me if I am wrong but I don't think he's arguing the flipping of the tractor, rather the comment made about hooking to the drawbar putting downward force on the front end.

My understanding of this is that a drawbar, below the axle line, and a straight pull rearward, does indeed help to counteract the axle torque, but not stop it completely. It's about leverage, the drawbar is only about a foot below the CL of the axle. The tires are contacting the ground about 2' or more below the axle cl. The wheels have more mechanical advantage than the drawbar, therefor the possibility is still present to raise the front of the tractor. How far it raises is dependent on several other variables like length of drawbar, weight over front, traction, etc. In all reality, everyone knows that a tractor will break traction first, if hitched properly, but it DOES NOT add more weight to the front end, even if pulling in a straight line.

My conclusion is that traction, or lack of, is the only thing that keeps the front planted, not the hitch adding weight.

For sake of argument, take traction out of the equation. Say that the tires absolutly could not slip no matter what (like frozen, or poured in concrete), hook tractor to something with the drawbar, and put scales under front tires and see what happens. (This is just a hypothetical situation, I hope no one is dumb enought to do this)

After reading your post, and re-reading my original commet I see where I went wrong with my choice of words. I don't say or mean by my post that it would add weight to the front, but counter act the force of the axle by enough so the front would not come off the ground and be worth while for traction. In other words if you want to talk weight lets say you have 5000 lbs on the front axle the force from the rear axle is 6000 or 7000 lbs in the opposite directions, the drawbar or 3 point hitch will counter this enough (pull down on the front) so it will not rise. I did put in my comments when properly set up, this would mean connected and weighted properly. I did not mean the axle would increase under load to 6000 or 7000 lbs.
Any one who has used older tractors (vintage 1930's and 40's) that were not set up this way would have an idea of what I mean. Some of the old farmalls and even the Allis Chalmers with the 2 point system and drawbars connected to the back of the axle. The front wheels when disking or dragging would be very light on the ground or even spend a lot of time in the air.
 
   / Why 4 Wheel Drive #102  
So, is your point that a plow buried (say 8 inches down) represents a force below ground level that tends to "load" the tractor's front wheels ?
If so.... Well, Yeah, kinda, iffy/maybe.

But (Butt, but, butt) the empirical evidence suggests that the plow ALSO "pulls down" on the 3PH (mostly via tension in the top link) as it lifts soil to turn it - - and that down pull certainly overwhelms any below grade drag.
This is typically "solved" by adding front weights (suitcase) to hold the front end down.
Now I just have to b'leeve that smart old farmers know a thing or three...
They would LOVE to shed those weights off the front bumper and I don't mean just to replace it with a loader.
So given all this time and country experience I think they would have figured out how to keep the front end down by now without using weights, i.e. JUST by mucking with lift arm and implement geometry if it were practical.
{NOTE: "possible" .NE. "practical"}

You have to look at the line of action of any force in relation to the pivot point. This tells what the lever is. In the case of the plow, if it is pulling down on the hitch it could still want to rotate the tractor off the front.
 
   / Why 4 Wheel Drive #103  
So, is your point that a plow buried (say 8 inches down) represents a force below ground level that tends to "load" the tractor's front wheels ?
If so.... Well, Yeah, kinda, iffy/maybe.

But (Butt, but, butt) the empirical evidence suggests that the plow ALSO "pulls down" on the 3PH (mostly via tension in the top link) as it lifts soil to turn it - - and that down pull certainly overwhelms any below grade drag.
This is typically "solved" by adding front weights (suitcase) to hold the front end down.
Now I just have to b'leeve that smart old farmers know a thing or three...
They would LOVE to shed those weights off the front bumper and I don't mean just to replace it with a loader.
So given all this time and country experience I think they would have figured out how to keep the front end down by now without using weights, i.e. JUST by mucking with lift arm and implement geometry if it were practical.
{NOTE: "possible" .NE. "practical"}

You have to look at the line of action of any force in relation to the pivot point. This tells what the lever is. In the case of the plow, if it is pulling down on the hitch it could still want to rotate the tractor off the front.
Yes. It occurs that the lever on whatever downforce there is, is very long compared to the lever on front tip that results from about 6" [(0+12)/2] below surface application point. We then have [simplistically]: 0.5 X pull force = ft-lb torque about axle forward tip.... and what?.. > 5feet X plow reactant downforce = backtip torque. This drastically favors backtip if downforce is any significant portion of pullforce.
Further, and however, I thot a well adjusted plow did not apply high net downforces - they being offset by tailoring penetration resistance. I do not know this - its just that Man is pretty clever and the potential is there.

gpflepsen, My background is similar to yours. I took some Physics at Georgia Tech back in the early '70s. I find a lot of insight tho, comes from just paying attention to how things work. Literally, its not such a big step from using wrenches to figuring this out. The trick is figuring out which variables and in what combination they can be factored out to give an easy grasp of the problem.
larry
 
   / Why 4 Wheel Drive #104  
Harry Ferguson is the man! He it the master Jedi of the "force." If your tractor has a Ferguson style 3-pt hitch, and the front end is about to rise: "Use the force Luke!"

If your turn plow is supposedly causing your front end to rise, presumably due to top link tension, you are on the DARK SIDE of the force. Adjust your top link and your plow to be on the right side of the force, so your top link goes into compression, and your draught control raised the hitch. May the force be with you!

(Sorry for all the "Star Wars" references if you have not seen the movie.)
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2011 Nissan Titan SV 4x4 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A50323)
2011 Nissan Titan...
JOHN DEERE 250 SKID STEER (A51242)
JOHN DEERE 250...
2023 KOMATSU WA480-8 LOADER (A51242)
2023 KOMATSU...
Wolverine Mini Skid Steer Auger Drive & Bit (A50515)
Wolverine Mini...
71068 (A49346)
71068 (A49346)
19200 (A50324)
19200 (A50324)
 
Top