MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 57,990
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
I and some of my co-workers pondered this question a few years ago (more than 10 years now) and spent some time figuring out what kind of income a person would have to make to offset the welfare benefits. It turned out to be a little over $40k. At that time a Computer Software engineer with a several years of experience was making about $60k. Welfare provided so many benefits that it was not economical to even try to get off welfare. Bottom line: The incentive as provided by the government is to not do anything to risk losing the welfare benefits, since the alternative is to work hard for less than welfare will provide.
About 10 years ago we did a similar study at my employer. It was something like $34K in benefits were available to a single head of household (male or female) with 3 children. You'd have to find a job making $17 an hour in order to break even on the benefits, and that would consume 2000 hours of your time. Why would anyone with a lick of sense work 2000 hours a year to break even on something they could get for free?
It's better to keep a separate address from your old lady, you work, and she stays home with your kids. Then she's bringing in $34K in benefits plus your $34K a year salary, and just like that, you're making $68K per year, your woman is home with the kids, dinner's on the table and life's good.
Welcome to Indiana. :laughing: