You might say "Chance favors the prepared mind". Of course its possible to get some good life out of a cheap [both meanings for this post] machine, partially because either when the quality control lottery smiles on a good owner[regardless of machine] or craps on a bad one now you have a story...one's a testimonial and one's horror. Even happens to "better" machines, just you do often have some parts that are stouter [in material or design] and the tigher quality control should make the extremes closer and fewer....ahhh, bell curves.....
Steve has the perfect example of an informed consumer; weighed the cost/risks, did basic up-keep, didn't expect too much, and was happy when it performed better. Now for the $3-4K mentioned, I do think theres a machine lurking that might have been the better tool for the job, but no doubt $800 [$1300] is probably doing just as well as "premium brands" of a similar machine for around $2K [includes $100 for advertising and pretty name plate, more importantly remember Steve accepted a little more risk].
I got it!! The dumber the consumer, the more they should have to pay for any tool!! Just maybe, the sticker shock would wake them up to proper maintenance and use; combine that with some better parts and quality control, we have some long lasting tools! Nope, wouldn't work /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif; the corporations would find a spin on that too [can't have everyone running 25 year machines now can we] /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Anyway, I'm not going to say that you always "get what you pay for", but just remember right tool for the job, and price should be part of the "sniff test" (if it smells like a rat....)
Chad