AchingBack
Veteran Member
Don't forget to add helmets, head restraints, knee pads, shoulder pads, chaps, face shields, gloves, etc. etc. etc.![]()
a jock strap with a cup protector, and a partridge in a pear tree.
Don't forget to add helmets, head restraints, knee pads, shoulder pads, chaps, face shields, gloves, etc. etc. etc.![]()
I'm ok with ROPS but manufacturers should only make them 12"-16" higher than tallest expected operator based on the butt to head height of the average human. AVERAGE human, not you skyscraper freaks of nature. (Humor intended).
This has been discussed before. The height thing doesn't hold up under scrutiny. The height above my head on all three of my tractors is different. The largest tractor being the shortest. On a side roll it would likely end on it's top or go right on over to opposite side or wheels. Least likely to do such would be the little JD.
Not sure why my comment made anyone believe I don't understand the intention of rops.
My point is/was on my Kubota there is no way the rops is tall enough to limit the severity of the roll. And if you draw a straight line from the top of the rops to the top of the hood it becomes obvious there is no room for a driver inside the triangle safely.
I'll dig thru my pics and try to find a side shot of each of my tractors. You can then form your own opinions about the effectiveness of each.![]()
We find that different manufacturers interpret the regs differently. On average, it seems the Japanese built Mahindra tractors have shorter ROPS relative to similar size Korean built Mahindra tractors. Not sure if that holds true across the board.
We know of a handful of rolled tractors, not including the fatal I mentioned above. On a late model tractor with a loader and ROPS, a side roll often happens when an operator has the bucket loaded and up in the air too high and is on a bit of a side hill and then turns. On the rolls with which I am familiar, they have all gone just 90 degrees. The ROPS and the loader arresting the roll at that point.