SeymourBota
Platinum Member
2 pages to this thread yesterday and 7 (or more) today!!! This could set a record.
So, I need expert commentary on this:
Normally, the engine(s) move the entire plane (and consequently the entire wingspan) through the air- even while still on the ground and not generating enough lift to fly.
In this scenario, the entire wingspan does not get to move, but rather air is drawn over it in 1,2 or 4 (or however many) points an engine exists.
Would the question not be whether the engine(s) can generate enough airflow over their localized portions of the wing to generate lift- sufficient to support the whole plane?
I have no idea how much a jet engine, for example, can generate in localized air flow, but a heck of alot is necessary over a long wing to lift a heavy jet.
A smaller, lighter prop driven plane with a large engine(s) and aggressive-pitch prop(s) seems like it would stand a better chance of creating enough airflow over enough wing area to generate the lift necessary to counter the weight of the plane, allowing it to take off.
So, I need expert commentary on this:
Normally, the engine(s) move the entire plane (and consequently the entire wingspan) through the air- even while still on the ground and not generating enough lift to fly.
In this scenario, the entire wingspan does not get to move, but rather air is drawn over it in 1,2 or 4 (or however many) points an engine exists.
Would the question not be whether the engine(s) can generate enough airflow over their localized portions of the wing to generate lift- sufficient to support the whole plane?
I have no idea how much a jet engine, for example, can generate in localized air flow, but a heck of alot is necessary over a long wing to lift a heavy jet.
A smaller, lighter prop driven plane with a large engine(s) and aggressive-pitch prop(s) seems like it would stand a better chance of creating enough airflow over enough wing area to generate the lift necessary to counter the weight of the plane, allowing it to take off.