workmaster 55

   / workmaster 55
  • Thread Starter
#11  
Yeah, you're right. I'd, hope they wouldn't. Do know any problems people are having with these tractors?
 
   / workmaster 55 #12  
Yeah, you're right. I'd, hope they wouldn't. Do know any problems people are having with these tractors?

I honestly don't know many who own them but I've heard they have the drivetrain of the old TN line which were solid tractors.
 
   / workmaster 55 #13  
I was considering a Workmaster 45 or 55 when I was in the market last spring. They seemed to be light for the horsepower rateing and I wanted a good power to weight ratio. Other then that they have a good reputation and my local dealer was both close by and good to work with. Several neighbors have NHs of varing sizes with no complaints but when I sat on a JD 5045E with a 553 loader there was no comparison and I was all done. Test drive one and you will see what I mean. Oh and the $$$ were almost identical.
 
   / workmaster 55
  • Thread Starter
#14  
I have looked at the John Deere 5055E. But the $ difference here is alot. I do like the tractors though.
 
   / workmaster 55 #15  
The Workmaster 55 is essentially an economy model of the older TC55DA model but without the Deluxe features. It's a simple, no-frills design meant for work more than pizazz. I would suggest not leaving the 3PH empty when using the FEL to handle bales. At least have the tires loaded. Putting a heavy boxblade on the 3PH also works.

I understand there are times you'd have to use the FEL first for a round bale. If you unload off a truck or double high bale from a stack with a spear on the FEL, only the first bale has to be unloaded with nothing on the 3PH. After you unload one, transfer it to the 3PH and then unload the rest using the one on the 3PH as ballast. So my suggestions are:

1. Don't use the FEL to move a round bale without ballast or a bale on the rear.

2. If you must unload a 1st bale with the FEL, transfer it to the 3PH before continuing.

3. Always transport bales on the FEL with minimum ground clearance. Drop the bale to within a foot of the ground and curl up to keep the bale stable.

4. When unloading a trailer or truck, always have your approach on smooth flat ground if possible. Make sure the ground is firm and the front tires won't sink or one tire sink causing the tractor to lean.

5. When carrying a bale high, move very slowly until you are clear and lower the bale immediately.

6. Transport single bales on the 3PH when possible.
 
   / workmaster 55
  • Thread Starter
#16  
Thanks so much this is most helpful! So, you wouldn't be afraid to carry them on the back at all.?.?.
 
   / workmaster 55 #17  
Thanks so much this is most helpful! So, you wouldn't be afraid to carry them on the back at all.?.?.

Not at all. Carrying a bale on the 3PH actually reduces the load on the front axle from the bale on the FEL. When you don't have a bale on he FEL, it will provide plenty of ballast to have good front wheel traction. If you ever carry on the rear with the FEL removed, you will probably notice the front end gets light and you'll understeer, but with the FEL on and a bale on the 3PH, you will be fine. The 3PH is stronger than your FEL and has higher lift capacity. That configuration will be the most stable also. The only problem with the 3PH is that you can't lift bales from high on a stack nor place them very high off the ground. You are height limited with the 3PH.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 Ford F-250 Pickup Truck (A44572)
2016 Ford F-250...
Ryobi Compound Miter Saw (A44391)
Ryobi Compound...
Heavy-Duty 4-Wheel Rolling Warehouse Cart  74in x 32in (A46877)
Heavy-Duty 4-Wheel...
New Holland LS180 Skid Steer (A44391)
New Holland LS180...
70in Heavy Duty Dozer Blade (A44391)
70in Heavy Duty...
2003 Ford F-450 Fuel and Lube Truck, VIN # 1FDXF46S73EC90253 (A44391)
2003 Ford F-450...
 
Top