YM1401D

   / YM1401D #11  
The 400 pounds I mentioned in my post are not calculated or written down anywhere. It is just my seat-of-the pants impression of what my particular machine with my particular loader will safely handle. I have lifted more than that on a few occasions, but I could see the loader frame flex a bit and feel the rear tires get real light even with 350 pounds hanging off the 3 point. I just don't want to reach the point where something breaks or worse yet end up with "rubber side up" if you know what I mean.
 
   / YM1401D #12  
I am in the process of picking up my 1401 next week. I am thourghly IMPRESSED with mine. I don't know much about the 1500, but have heard nothing but good about the 1401. A good small tractor. I am using mine for plowing snow, tilling a garden, and mowing the lawn. Mine is 2wd though. But I am satisfied with that. The locking differential will help a lot on that note. In my opinion, you CANT go wrong with a 1401.

Aric /w3tcompact/icons/king.gif
 
   / YM1401D #13  
Trentay, you bring up good points, and food for thought. But if exact answers exist, I don't know them. For instance, I have never seen the various tractor/loader stress combinations published. They would be easy enough to calculate, but there seems to be little interest. People seem to prefer to trust their instincts. Most just experiment until they find some level that they feel comfortable with.

Full frames for loaders are another matter. Much is known. The need for them in rough service is well documented as are the designs. I tend to do that kind of work on my own machines, but imagine that any Ag fab shop will do it for you if you are concerned about the tractor. Yanmar even published some recommendations on this subject for the last of their models right before they quit selling in this country, so the knowledge is available. When Yanmar was making loaders for their tractors, some came as full frame and some as bell housing only. It all depended on how the tractor was constructed. For example, the YM165D came stock with a full frame loader and the 336D with a bell housing mount. Both being a reflection of how the tractor was built.

The issue of "how much weight is in a bucket" is most interesting. I think I'll start a new thread under that subject and see what we can learn.
 
   / YM1401D #14  
The rear sub frame mount is fine but on that size tractor it is mega over kill. You will brake the front axel housing before you need a rear subframe on a 1401D.
 
   / YM1401D #15  
Usually you only have to worry about a subframe if the tractor has a weak (say aluminum bell housing such as the Hinomoto E2302). They will break into . I have not experienced such problems with the Yanmar tractors. By saying that I will have a mega problem tommorrow!

Thanks,
Bruce
 
   / YM1401D
  • Thread Starter
#16  
Well I went by the dealers place on Saturday and he
had sold the 1401D. I talked my self into buying
a 1510. I really wanted a FWD but this was a nice
tractor and I liked the shuttle shift. Besides he
made me a very good deal on it. So good that if
it doesn't work out I could buy a 1510D and use this
one for parts. What is everyone's thoughts on the 1510?
 
   / YM1401D #17  
Don't know much about the 1510 but if its like other Yanmars you won't need one for parts. Maybe you can trade it back to the dealer if the 2WD doesn't work out.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Post Hole Digger Auger (A50774)
Post Hole Digger...
Guard Rail Pieces (A51692)
Guard Rail Pieces...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
16ft T/A Flatbed Equipment Trailer (A50322)
16ft T/A Flatbed...
2017 FREIGHTLINER BUSINESS CLASS M2 T/A DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2017 FREIGHTLINER...
2014 Chevrolet Impala Limited (A50120)
2014 Chevrolet...
 
Top