Yankee
Gold Member
"That's about like saying that the Kubota's have a poor drivetrain. "
The difference is that one is a factual statement, i.e., can be validated (the current Deere frames either are or are not stamped and less substantial than previous models), the other is a pure value judgement ("poor").
Of course, whether or not the comparison of current to previous Deere frames is material to the tractor's usage is an open question, as there are any number of reasons why the design might have changed. Stamped steel frames are perfectly suitable for garden tractors. They COULD even be used in CUTs and full-sized tractors, though the manufacturing issues would start to mount quickly with the heavier steel that would be required. The real issue here is, as someone else has already pointed out, an apples to oranges comparison.
The guy has to figure out whether he wants a garden tractor or a sub-CUT. If it's the former, the Deere frame is just fine.
Bill
The difference is that one is a factual statement, i.e., can be validated (the current Deere frames either are or are not stamped and less substantial than previous models), the other is a pure value judgement ("poor").
Of course, whether or not the comparison of current to previous Deere frames is material to the tractor's usage is an open question, as there are any number of reasons why the design might have changed. Stamped steel frames are perfectly suitable for garden tractors. They COULD even be used in CUTs and full-sized tractors, though the manufacturing issues would start to mount quickly with the heavier steel that would be required. The real issue here is, as someone else has already pointed out, an apples to oranges comparison.
The guy has to figure out whether he wants a garden tractor or a sub-CUT. If it's the former, the Deere frame is just fine.
Bill