bandit67
Veteran Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Messages
- 1,610
- Location
- Lake Hartwell, SC
- Tractor
- 2012 B3000 HSDCC 2020 Z251 Zero Turn
jambx,
I guess if I were looking for my first machine, I would seriously consider the B2X20's, as they are a nice 'starter' size.
But after owning a subcompact, and then looking at the two larger machines side-by-side, it felt as if the 2920 was very close in size to the subcompact I had. Yes, the 3030 did feel quite a bit larger, but still feels like a 'small' machine. It is very maneuverable for it's size (note the turning radius is exactly the same between the 2920 and the 3030), but is large enough to handle many tasks. The ground clearance on the 3030 sized machines is awesome when coming from a subcompact.
Also, since the 60" bucket is the widest part of the tractor, it can still squeeze into some pretty tight spaces. I like the 3030 size, as it is still easy to 'hop' on and off much like the subcompact was.
For me, it just seemed to make more sense to move to a machine that was noticeably bigger (B3030), rather than one that felt barely bigger (B2920) than my subcompact. I know ChuckinNH went from a BX to the B2620, but I think he had some real tight space constraints to consider.
If you don't have the space constraints, and can swing the extra $$, I'd recommend the B3200. I chose the B3030 after renting a B7800 on my current property. It is a 'small' machine that can handle a lot of bigger machine tasks. It seems very powerful for it's size, and prior to getting it, I also ran an L35 and a full size TLB on this same property. So far, after 155 hours, I do not wish for a larger machine. After about 20 hours on my subcompact, I was wishing I had been able to get something bigger.
I guess if I were looking for my first machine, I would seriously consider the B2X20's, as they are a nice 'starter' size.
But after owning a subcompact, and then looking at the two larger machines side-by-side, it felt as if the 2920 was very close in size to the subcompact I had. Yes, the 3030 did feel quite a bit larger, but still feels like a 'small' machine. It is very maneuverable for it's size (note the turning radius is exactly the same between the 2920 and the 3030), but is large enough to handle many tasks. The ground clearance on the 3030 sized machines is awesome when coming from a subcompact.
Also, since the 60" bucket is the widest part of the tractor, it can still squeeze into some pretty tight spaces. I like the 3030 size, as it is still easy to 'hop' on and off much like the subcompact was.
For me, it just seemed to make more sense to move to a machine that was noticeably bigger (B3030), rather than one that felt barely bigger (B2920) than my subcompact. I know ChuckinNH went from a BX to the B2620, but I think he had some real tight space constraints to consider.
If you don't have the space constraints, and can swing the extra $$, I'd recommend the B3200. I chose the B3030 after renting a B7800 on my current property. It is a 'small' machine that can handle a lot of bigger machine tasks. It seems very powerful for it's size, and prior to getting it, I also ran an L35 and a full size TLB on this same property. So far, after 155 hours, I do not wish for a larger machine. After about 20 hours on my subcompact, I was wishing I had been able to get something bigger.