WilliamBos
Super Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2004
- Messages
- 5,278
- Location
- Innisfil, Ontario, Canada
- Tractor
- MF 1635 12x12 Powershuttle
Interesting. Changing the oil that soon is a total waste, but hey, it is not my money.
If synthetic flows down then molybedelum should help a lot.
Molybdenum molecules are shaped as lenses. Only problem is that they are magnetic and tend to stand on the edge. Once they are flattened and pressed into material they are supposed to protect they lower "dry" friction in example during engine start. Once the engine is lubricated and running the shaft "floats" in the bearings without touching them so the effect of molybdenum is insignificant.
I am originally from Europe. We used to change oil in cars (as recommended by the manufacturer) in about 10000 km or 6000 miles. It was more than 20 years ago. Since then the oils especially the stability were greatly improved.
I heard a story on radio several years ago about an experiment of a taxi company in New York. They bought several new Chevy Impalas and half of them had oil and filter changed every 3000 miles and the other half had only filter changed and oil added. When the cars had 100 000 miles they disassembled the engines and found that there wasn't difference in wear.
We should be environmentally responsible but I still change oil in my tractor as recommended. I used to have Buick Regal 1991. I stopped changing oil when the car had 200K. I changed filter in about 5000 miles interval. The engine died at 247K due to failed hydraulic lifter. Until then it used very little oil.
That used to be all the rage.. There were moly-application kits available for the handloaders and everything. Are guys still doing that?I sprayed molybendelum disulfide in my rifle barrel and it keeps it cleen longer and it cleaned easier. (just a little off subject though)
DP - I never noticed a difference in accuracy in some extremely accurate rifles, either. I've been away from shooting for a while now, but I remember the bullet mfrs seeming to back away from offering as many coated bullets after the initial optimism was offset by the realization that extra cleaning chores were now required.I moly coated my hand loaded bullets and did a bunch of bench rest test shooting with no noticable difference in accuracy or velocity out to 600 yards. It did cut down on carbon and copper deposits on one hand but I just changed the carbon deposits for heavy moly deposits on the other. Lets just say I no longer coat my bullets. A application to the barrel doesn't cause the ever increasing deposits like coated bullets does and does seem to reduce carbon and copper deposits.
DP - I never noticed a difference in accuracy in some extremely accurate rifles, either. I've been away from shooting for a while now, but I remember the bullet mfrs seeming to back away from offering as many coated bullets after the initial optimism was offset by the realization that extra cleaning chores were now required.![]()
Now that we've dragged this completely off-topicdid you ever try David Tubbs' FinalFinish barrel-lapping bullet setup? I had some good luck with a couple rough barrels (a 7-08 and a 308) that smoothed up nicely after running the program.