radioman
Super Member
What size would you reccomend, with or without BH?
16 footer is a nice size with BH and without. It's what I have and I think its the right size.
What size would you reccomend, with or without BH?
But not a land scape trailer.16 footer is a nice size with BH and without. It's what I have and I think its the right size.
But not a land scape trailer.
They are built much lighter .Why not ? It works just fine. I think you are overthinking it.![]()
They are built much lighter .
They are built much lighter .
But not a land scape trailer.
Why not ? It works just fine. I think you are overthinking it.![]()
I believe if a trailer is rated for 7000 #GVW then it doesn't matter if its a equipment or a landscape. They ARE BOTH RATED for 7000# gvw
And my dealer ( they have 4 stores) delivered uses a 7k on a regular basis for B series and BX TLB.
let it go!
Exactly!-This gives me more carry on weight, not less. I wouldnt want a trailer that weights 3k and then its no good for the BX and attachments. Plus lighter means better gas mileage when towing empty.If you want a heavier trialer, then you will need to look for something in the 10k to 14k range. A decent 7k rated trailer weighs nearly 2k anyways, so this is plenty heavy enough for a car. In fact, my trailer dealer showed a car hauler and its has the exact same frame but higher rated tires as my trailer. The car hauler was close to 3k range and it appears to be a deck over but it had a metal deck which is not what I need. As diamond pilot mentioned before, its the axels and tire ratings that is the weak link, not the frame itself. So add a landscape ramp or a car ramp, its the exact same trailer.
OK you fellows may have me convinced .My 16' Aluma landscape trailer is rated at 7000#. Dual axle and dual brake, I think that's plenty for a BX.
OK you fellows may have me convinced .
Which one cost the least ?
Why chose one over the other.
What are some of the differences between the two?![]()