I not so sure it is just a point about the features, but also more about the design. Yes they both have 4 cyl engines but as the head office Kubota tech rep described it to me, the newer generation moves the HST to a different connect point in relation to the engine, more padding on the floorboards, different HST pedal configuration setup, etc.. which all contribute to less vibration overall. If I would have had that discussion with him before, I would have started out with the B3030 right away and saved myself the extra work of having to re-deal (mind you that is somewhat fun in itself) I have the 60" MMM and I also subscribe to the ie: spread cost over the life of the tractor and being happy with it as opposed to some regrets. Thought I had done that the first time around and I had the size, HP, main features ie: FEL and MMM right, just not the extra feature options. I didn't think I would need or make use of them since this was a hefty purchase to begin with getting the B3200. For me, it did not suit my needs and I had to change my thinking along with help from comments made here on TBN as well. We all know no one tractor is perfect (even Kubota) but it is nice to be nearly all satisfied for our particular needs and uses.![]()
Now this is the kind of info that means something. How is the hst connected and what other major build differences are there.
The cosmetic stuff like 3pt arms etc is really not that important because it can all be retrofitted if desired but how the machine is build can't be changed.
This is the info that would change my mind on the 3030 over the 3200.
Is there more