Branchchipper
Silver Member
A old debate has resurfaced locally. I remember many past discussions about the inadvisability of using a hydrostatic tractor to run a pto baler.
I realized that I don't, however, have any concrete evidence that this is "bad" for the tractor.
In my neighborhood are an L5030hst, a Ford 3000 and a Ford 5000. In my book, the 5000 is the obvious baler tractor (the baler in question this time is an older mid-size JD rectangular baler of unknown PTO hp requirement)
Of the three tractors, however, the L5030hst, however, is in the best shape with regard to brakes and everything else.
So, what are the issues with this load on the Hst's pto (provided that it turned out to be an OK match with regard to pto hp)?
I realized that I don't, however, have any concrete evidence that this is "bad" for the tractor.
In my neighborhood are an L5030hst, a Ford 3000 and a Ford 5000. In my book, the 5000 is the obvious baler tractor (the baler in question this time is an older mid-size JD rectangular baler of unknown PTO hp requirement)
Of the three tractors, however, the L5030hst, however, is in the best shape with regard to brakes and everything else.
So, what are the issues with this load on the Hst's pto (provided that it turned out to be an OK match with regard to pto hp)?