As a 2005
L39 owner and the owner of a 1997 Komatsu PC75UU-2E 18,000 lb Excavator, I've been a troll following this thread. I'm a bit concerned about damaging the pumps on either of my machine as I am not in a position to afford to repair them if they fail, so I want to pick up any tips on operation or maintenance.
(SNIP)
So I'm wondering if something in the basic design hydraulic system of an
M59 is allowing the oil to foam or cause other problems.
Although rated HP of the excavator is the same as an
M59, the hydraulic reservoir hold 30 gallons of oil and the pumps put out almost 50% more volume and pressure than the
M59, while not suffering The issues some
M59 owners seem to have.
Well, maybe. I wonder the same thing too. Here's what I think: If it were a design flaw or an issue with the
M59 model, then it seems like they should all do it. But we have to be careful complaining.....most of the
M59 owners have no problems at all. Read the post from sdgsr right above this one. Reading back over the model history, owners that are not completely satisfied with the hydraulics are rare and breakdowns even rarer. And often things can be a harmless idiosyncrasy of a design rather than a fault.
On HerseyFarm's machine the hydraulic fluid gets too hot, and that seems the worst real problem we've come across. Though as far as I can remember his is the only one that does this. Is that right Hersey? And he does work the machine hard, although within spec. On mine, I get a cold weather hydraulic whine until it warms up, but nobody else gets that or at least hasn't reported it. And my whine doesn't change pitch when I use the backhoe, loader, or hydro when it is doing it. So who knows?
As for the foaming pictures, near as I can tell, the foaming is a new way to look at things and still too soon to know what that means...if anything. I wish some other people would check that on their machine and post a few pictures, though. Either foaming is common or it isn't, and either way I'd be interested to know more.
It may be that I simply caused the foaming by the way I took the sample. Taking a sample with a syringe means pulling the oil up by lowering the pressure via the syringe. The problem is that doing it that way is that reducing the pressure on a fluid is the most common way to cause foaming in any liquid. I might be seeing nothing more than a problem that I created. In fact, chances are good that's a large part of it. I need to figure out how to draw some oil samples in a different way.
Dsgr writes: "I have yet to find a large enough Hypo syringe with hose to take a pic. of the oil for you folks."
For anyone else interested, I got the hypo syringe from the horse vet, who also supplied a catheter tube that would fit the syringe and would withdraw the oil.
Yep,I agree.... the Komatsu does run about 50% higher pressure, but then Komatus also uses a different and unique type of load-sensing hydraulic system which is more related to JD's closed center hydraulic system. Both are a whole different animal than what Kubota uses. And Komatsu is lucky in that they can afford to spend their HP on higher hydraulic pressure since they don't have the same demands for travel that tractors do. The Kubota
M59 uses a much simpler standard open center hydraulic system which should be -IMHO - much simpler, cheaper, and more rugged.
But I'm not knocking Komatsu. Those guys have an impressive machine, and their hydraulic scheme is downright ingenious. I'd love to have one.
rScotty