Short Game
Veteran Member
I don't know, my LL4100 loader is so gutless that I doubt it could hurt itself doing anything, except maybe stopping the tractor's fall at the bottom of a cliff. Just this evening I started looking at the possibility of adapting my Cub Cadet 417 loader to the LS mounts. I guess learning that not only is my stock loader weak, in comparison, but when I could not raise my most recent keg of ale to the level of my deck, falling a whole foot short, that frosted me, not the ale. This is a job the little Cub Cadet had to be watched on so as to not raise the keg too high and hit the deck railing. That shortfall was just about the last straw. Subsequently, I measured the loader booms from top pivot pin to bucket roll-back pin. The LS's span is 67 inches. My Cub Cadet's is 79 inches. Not only is the loader weaker, it is considerably smaller. Even the bucket is smaller.
If and when I do the adaption, I'll post pictures of my yellow loader on my blue tractor. I am hoping the top brass at LS has been reading about my disappointments with the loader. I'm waiting to hear from them. I want to know why a tractor with a third more weight and a third more horsepower has such an inferior loader. So I guess I'm spoiled. The question is, why was I spoiled by a 1996 27 HP Cub Cadet's loader? Doesn't LS wonder about that?
I bought this tractor to replace the Cub Cadet. I bought a bigger tractor in order to do more. In many ways it does do more. Loader-wise, not so. The loader is no small part of what I depend upon in a tractor. Did I make a mistake getting this tractor?
I don't want any heat coming back on the dealer I bought it from. This is LS's issue. The fact that they have upped the size of the bucket cylinders from 2010 to 2011 says they have a clue that there is a problem.
If and when I do the adaption, I'll post pictures of my yellow loader on my blue tractor. I am hoping the top brass at LS has been reading about my disappointments with the loader. I'm waiting to hear from them. I want to know why a tractor with a third more weight and a third more horsepower has such an inferior loader. So I guess I'm spoiled. The question is, why was I spoiled by a 1996 27 HP Cub Cadet's loader? Doesn't LS wonder about that?
I bought this tractor to replace the Cub Cadet. I bought a bigger tractor in order to do more. In many ways it does do more. Loader-wise, not so. The loader is no small part of what I depend upon in a tractor. Did I make a mistake getting this tractor?
I don't want any heat coming back on the dealer I bought it from. This is LS's issue. The fact that they have upped the size of the bucket cylinders from 2010 to 2011 says they have a clue that there is a problem.
Last edited: