fieldman12
Gold Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
- Messages
- 415
- Location
- OHIO
- Tractor
- 2001 New Holland TN70,2003 John Deere 250 Series II skidsteer,1987 John Deere 2155,2013 John Deere 5055E MFWD,2007 Duramax 4x4 truck, 1973 MF 165,Artic Cat 550 Cougar sled
I never knew the differences between the 165 and 255 - wet brakes and what else were the differences?
1.The 255 had the A4-236 engine that was suppose to be a more well balanced and smoother running engine than the A4-203 Perkins in our 165. Both where Perkings four cylinder engines.
2. Wet brakes where an option on the 255. you can tell by rear end. There is a plate with notches on both sides for the wet brake setup.
3. The gears patterns where switched around on the eight speed in the 255 versus the eight speed in the 165.
4. The throttle linkage was a better setup on the 255.
5. The break and clutch setup was different. The 165 was mounted from top and went straight down to floor when pushed. On the 255 they came up from the bottom below the floor boards.
6. Battery location on 255 was moved to front and a much larger battery.
Other than that and sheet metal for the most part they where identical. Personally I think the 165 was a better looking machine and one of the nicest looking for that size and time frame. The older 165's had some other slight differences than the later models.