So this is where it gets interesting.... You can have along drawn out debate about Fukashima, but in the end it was this old design plant. 50 year old architecture when it should have been 10 year old architecture. This is where I feel the greatest disconnect is.
Take a look at this Greenpeace article
Yes, things are very bad at Fukushima but it
So moving on from Fukashima, the question is asked how many people have died from Nuclear Reactor Meltdowns. Roughly 47 - Russian, in the US none. How many have died from exposure via cancer, 4,000 on the very highest end. OK, not great, actually kinda scary. But then the question comes how many people have died from Coal. In the US roughly 100,000 have died directly from mining coal since the 1920's. How many have died from black lung or other coal related illness? A milllion? Do we want to look at greenhouse gasses, global warming, and all the other ways coal effects all of us?
Look, I am a greenie, a liberal, but Solar and wind manufacturing isn't a very clean process and it is terribly inneficient. Nuke can be quite safe, but, IMO, the oil and gas companies have spent a lot of time and money keeping nukes from modernizing, while demonizing the industry. People are scared, and lots of people are making a lot of money keeping people scared.