HCJtractor
> My "data" about the risk of cycling comes from the book of experience and common sense.
Yet your common sense says the risk to you is the same as for a female. Yet common sense says a female is always going to be at greater risk to violence because generally speaking, males find it easier to accost women.
> The risk of being robbed of raped while riding is extremely small, from my knowledge and experience.
Again, common sense and statistics say men rarely understand the daily reality most women must deal with, directed at them by men.
Men fear rape in prison. Women fear rape more in "free" society.
> First what do I have to steal that is tempting?
Again, common sense says the form fitting outfits warn by female cyclist attract more of the wrong attention of men than your outfits attract by anyone. Women, just by being women have something men want. And there are plenty go bad guys that will take it at any cost. Again, just look at the statistics of military service by women.
> if you're a woman who wants to minimize the risk, don't ride alone if at all possible. That's not male chauvinism, but just good advice.
Because men are who they are.
> When my daughter runs, I tell her, stay away from desolate places. Run with a friend. There's safety in numbers. Can anyone disagree with that?
Nope. But would you have to warn your son in the same way and as often?
> But in my opinion, carrying a weapon does very little to make you safer on a bike from 99.9% of those things that will hurt you. But everyone has the right to decide that for themselves. As long as you have a legal permit and the skill and knowledge to handle and control your weapon, and the maturity to know when to use it, I'm perfectly good with that.
Yet you voice your opposition to anyone doing what you don't feel they should do. Even if they are legal in doing so.
Does all of the above still sound like common sense?