CobyRupert
Super Member
There's always an ongoing debate over the pro/cons of hydro vs. gear tractors. If hydro's go into relief, then there's a black mark for them.
I understand why a hydro would have a relief valve, but good god, shouldn't it be rated/set higher than the maximums torques that the engine could produce? (essentially protecting the tranny if someone made post-factory modifications like boosting the fuel pump or adding a bigger turbo etc..) That is, the tranny should be able to handle any torque the engine can dish out and more.
If I buy a 40 hp tractor, I'd expect that all the torque would be able to get to the tires and the tires should either spin or the engine should stall. I WOULDN"T expect the tranny to go into relief at some lesser value! Otherwise I haven't bought a 40 hp tractor.
This is like having a gear tractor and expecting the clutch to slip if the wheels get too much traction and the load is too heavy.
TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!
I understand why a hydro would have a relief valve, but good god, shouldn't it be rated/set higher than the maximums torques that the engine could produce? (essentially protecting the tranny if someone made post-factory modifications like boosting the fuel pump or adding a bigger turbo etc..) That is, the tranny should be able to handle any torque the engine can dish out and more.
If I buy a 40 hp tractor, I'd expect that all the torque would be able to get to the tires and the tires should either spin or the engine should stall. I WOULDN"T expect the tranny to go into relief at some lesser value! Otherwise I haven't bought a 40 hp tractor.
This is like having a gear tractor and expecting the clutch to slip if the wheels get too much traction and the load is too heavy.
TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!