Help...shoudnt the tires spin ???

   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ???
  • Thread Starter
#51  
I use high range now than I ever did. Drop it in 4 wheel mid to scoop and pop it in high 2 wheel to transfer.1800 rpm

Well......I guess most missed my response to my own post...the reason the tires wouldn't spin when I was trying to push over a small bush was I DIDNT REALIZE I HAD IT IN HI RANGE....As soon as I put it in low, where it should have been....it chewed up ground !

Again it was MY error and just an oversight....
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ??? #52  
Well......I guess most missed my response to my own post...the reason the tires wouldn't spin when I was trying to push over a small bush was I DIDNT REALIZE I HAD IT IN HI RANGE....As soon as I put it in low, where it should have been....it chewed up ground ! Again it was MY error and just an oversight....
You may have started the thread but this is a forum you are going to get others in it talking expressing their thoughts. You started it but don't own it.
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ??? #53  
You may have started the thread but this is a forum you are going to get others in it talking expressing their thoughts. You started it but don't own it.

Yeah, you didn't build that! ;-)

Sent from my iPad using TractorByNet
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ???
  • Thread Starter
#54  
You may have started the thread but this is a forum you are going to get others in it talking expressing their thoughts. You started it but don't own it.[/QUOTE


Lol, really....Don't claim ownership to the post...but it would be nice if we replied to the original and didn't ADD or put words in the OP's mouth....
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ??? #55  
I was trying to stay on topic!
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ???
  • Thread Starter
#56  
I was trying to stay on topic!

Yes most did try to read my original post and understand I didn't "ram" anything...however some have a hard time reading and not inserting their own words and making it sound like I was running a bulldozer, lol

Oh well ....some just lovvveeee to argue
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ??? #58  
There's always an ongoing debate over the pro/cons of hydro vs. gear tractors. If hydro's go into relief, then there's a black mark for them.

I understand why a hydro would have a relief valve, but good god, shouldn't it be rated/set higher than the maximums torques that the engine could produce? (essentially protecting the tranny if someone made post-factory modifications like boosting the fuel pump or adding a bigger turbo etc..) That is, the tranny should be able to handle any torque the engine can dish out and more.

If I buy a 40 hp tractor, I'd expect that all the torque would be able to get to the tires and the tires should either spin or the engine should stall. I WOULDN"T expect the tranny to go into relief at some lesser value! Otherwise I haven't bought a 40 hp tractor.
This is like having a gear tractor and expecting the clutch to slip if the wheels get too much traction and the load is too heavy.
TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!

In such a configuration when the drive train can take full power. Now when the hydraulic loaded is operated the engine will bog. Now some operators are going to complain about an under powered tractor . Can't win.
Sure it is possible to design an HST for the loads that a gear can benignly support in an overload engine stalling condition. However; due to the nature of an infinitely variable transmission, it must be either made hugely robust, or include built in protection against itself. This protection thwarts extreme hi torque performance.

...Regardless of tires/traction there will always be a situation where they cannot be spun on any tractor. Universally, to my knowledge, this will happen first with a fluid drive. This is because you dont have a mechanical connection between engine and wheels - the connection passes thru fluid and fluid pressure is limited by a relief valve. So the torque to the wheels is limited by the combination of the relief setting and the displacement of the hyd motor being driven and then the final drive [geared] ratio to the wheels. This is the ratio you select when you change ranges.

With an HST, regardless of the relief setting the engine cannot be stalled without abusive operation of the pedal because you are varying the displacement of the hyd pump. Without the relief, infinite forces would be available in any range just by adjusting the pedal, [and thereby pump displacement], so that the HP driving the pump would be able to deliver whatever pressure required to give the torque needed at the wheels. Of course the pressures would have to be proportionately higher in the higher ranges to get the torque needed at the wheels. Well, :( darn it anyway, we cant just keep kicking the forces up thruout the powertrain like that. We have to limit each part according to its ability. We limit the pump/motor with a protective relief valve, and we make the gears in the ranges amply strong to take the [thereby limited] hyd motor torque. We adjust the range gear ratios to give usable speed and wheel torque combinations. This part of the hst tractor is exactly analogous to a gear tractor if you recognize that each gear ratio is a range.
>>Not surprisingly, on modern gear tractors that usually have at least 8gears, the ratios are much more closely spaced thruout than they are with hst which has just 2 or 3 gears/ranges to cover the full range of conventional speeds. So you dont find a lo range gear ratio on an HST as low as 1st on an 8 speed. The hst will go faster in 1 of 3 than the gear in 1 of 8. That means the HST is effectively in a higher gear. And that means that the HST cannot deliver as much torque to the wheels if the relief valve is set safely. To realize this you have to take a close look at the interaction of the engine, pump, relief valve, and motor. Since the pump is variable from 0-100% the engine will be capable of driving it to deliver HUGE pressure at low pedal. Losses by leakage and other friction will limit the theoretical infinite pressure capability. However not to a low enuf level that destruction would not be inevitable if the wheels didnt turn. The relief has to be set at a level low enuf so that it will relieve if the tractor is stopped dead in a pull. If it didnt something requiring repair would give. The wheels would spin? In lo range maybe, but not in hi. If the relief doesnt give and the wheels dont spin the engine stops dead. This kind of impulse must be prevented.

,,,For maximum and "safe" power delivery it is done by setting the relief at a pressure that will stall the full engine power gracefully [say, about 1second] at full pedal. Somewhat more than full engine torque is being delivered to the pump in this situation, and an approx 2 or 3x multiple of engine HP is flushing fluid to the sump. The hyd pressure seen here is as high as it can go in the protected transmission. This pressure defines the max torque available from the motor that is driving the final ratio. Changing the flow with the pedal has only a tiny effect on this torque as the engine bogs. Because of the relief, backing off the pedal to let the engine work easy does only that - the pressure and therefore torque limit at the motor remains the same. That motor is working against a higher speed gear than 1st on the gear tractor. From all this, it follows directly that the HST cannot deliver as much torque to the wheels as the gear. ... For example - if the pressure protected HST goes 2mph at full pedal and rpm in lo range, and 1st on the gear goes 1mph topped out, the gear will deliver about twice the wheel torque. [And yes, a gear can be overloaded to failure] It is essentially an HST set for 1MPH and having no relief. But this only occurs in 1st on the gear. This setting is possible in any range on the HST. Whereas the gear would bog and stall while its clutch slipped a few revolutions, the HST operator could just lift the pedal and apply destructive hydraulic pressure without even bogging the engine. This is and must be prevented with the relief valve.

,,,With a gear, the higher overtorque limit allowed while the operator has real feedback foretelling the approaching limit lets him know where he begins to go into the overdesign safety factor, and know breakage is a multiple of the experienced lugdown torque. Theres lots to play with above the lugdown point and where the clutch will slip by design. This indication is not there with a HST and demands an automatic safety device. This causes an INHERENT deficiency in force capability of the HST. You want to turn up the relief? Fine, but realize the presence of the automated limit is part of the design. Since it is a highly repeatable "instant acting" limit the designers have set it much closer to the ultimate system strength.

>>Suitable design for geared however, demands high overtorque support with the hard linked system because that engine is going to experience a hard stall in a pull, perhaps many times. This torsions the geartrain and buckles the tire sidewalls and maybe induces a few revolutions of clutch slip. The gear was not designed to do this. It was designed to be able to survive it. You will never see such forces in proportion to its design goal in a system with an automated protective device. Turn your HST up 50%, and at load requiring that pressure you are operating beyond its safety limit with no indication. Turn it up 100% to make it able to deliver anywhere near the force induced in a gear stall and it might do it once ... Engine singing happily at lo pedal. But it made a new sound and now it doesnt seem the same...:confused3:
,,,larry
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ??? #59  
Wow, that's some amazing knowledge SPYDERLK! Thank you for sharing!
 
   / Help...shoudnt the tires spin ??? #60  
Because of the relief, backing off the pedal to let the engine work easy does only that - the pressure and therefore torque limit at the motor remains the same. That motor is working against a higher speed gear than 1st on the gear tractor. From all this, it follows directly that the HST cannot deliver as much torque to the wheels as the gear. ... For example - if the pressure protected HST goes 2mph at full pedal and rpm in lo range, and 1st on the gear goes 1mph topped out, the gear will deliver about twice the wheel torque.

The part I made bold is incorrect. If the user is backing off the pedal, the effective gear ratio that the engine has to work against is lowered. Even though the HST tractor has only three geared speeds as apposed to the geared tractor's eight, the variable swash plate in the hydraulic pump makes each of the three ranges effectively infinite.

You're right...in practice the necessary relief system is set low enough to protect everything down stream from that pump. We can't just allow infinite torque/pressure to be transmitted through all the downstream components. And in practice this may often result in a tractor that seems to put less torque to the ground than its traditionally geared brother.

But I want to point out that this is not an INHERENT limitation of HST. Beef up all your hoses and fittings and stuff, set the relief higher, and you could snap an axle off the same as you could by abusing a geared tractor. If you engineer the drive train of a geared tractor just barely strong enough that it won't be broken by sudden, full-stop traction against its engine running at full tilt...and you design the HST system of its otherwise twin brother to relieve just before breaking the other drive train components also, then they could put exactly the same maximum torque to the ground.

As you imply, we implement the relief because we don't want users approaching and exceeding the limit without feedback. So instead of suggesting that HST systems are deficient, what you're really saying is that both can put the maximum safe reliable torque to the ground, but that a geared tractor will let you go beyond that and break it if you want. To CobyRupert I'd say I'll take the infinitely variable ratio and the built-in protection, thanks.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2013 PHOENIX GLOBAL TANDEM AXLE MANIFOLD TRAILER (A52472)
2013 PHOENIX...
2013 Chevrolet Traverse LS SUV (A50324)
2013 Chevrolet...
2013 PETERBILT 386 TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER TRUCK (A52576)
2013 PETERBILT 386...
2008 INTERNATIONAL 4300 M7 SBA 4X2 DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2008 INTERNATIONAL...
2019 FORD TARNSIT CONECT CARGO VAN (A52577)
2019 FORD TARNSIT...
2011 DODGE RAM 2500 (A52472)
2011 DODGE RAM...
 
Top