rd_macgregor
Veteran Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,874
- Location
- Prince Edward Island, Canada
- Tractor
- Kioti DK45SC, Kubota B2650
My wife got a Ram ecodiesel truck last summer when our old Sierra crapped out. I was lobbying for the Ecoboost, but she never even got around to a test drive, after trying the Ram. With only about 8000 km, she is getting just over 10 l/100km (roughly 23mpg); this drops to about 13 l/100km (18 mpg) when we tow the 2-horse trailer. Although the Ram is quite comfortable and does fine for our uses, I think the ecoboost would have been a much more competent towing vehicle, overall.
The smaller Ecoboost might be a better comparison to the Ecodiesel...what do others think?
The torque of the ecodiesel is impressive, but it falls short on HP...the ecodiesel is 240hp/420fp vs. 325hp/375fp for the 2.7l ecoboost and 365hp/420fp for the 3.5l ecoboost. The horsepower difference is significant in acceleration, passing, maintaining speed on a grade, etc.
The smaller Ecoboost might be a better comparison to the Ecodiesel...what do others think?
The torque of the ecodiesel is impressive, but it falls short on HP...the ecodiesel is 240hp/420fp vs. 325hp/375fp for the 2.7l ecoboost and 365hp/420fp for the 3.5l ecoboost. The horsepower difference is significant in acceleration, passing, maintaining speed on a grade, etc.