. My point is being an LEO doesn't make our failure any more wrong than if we aren't LEO.
Absolutely wrong...
A police officer is in a position of trust. Public trust. Breaching the public trust under the color of law is worse than just plain old Joe brown breaking the law.
Look at charges. If you have a position of control over a child and hurt that child, it's a worse charge than if you just hurt some random child. ( IE.. custodial control.. etc. ).
So yes.. Being in a position that mostly puts you above the law... makes the fall a little longer when you jump off..
It is more wrong for a police officer to rob you.. than a regular joe to rob you.
Situation:
Guy walks up to you in a parking lot and asks for something, then hits you and takes it.
vs
Police officer pulls you over then does something illegal to you.
The police officer has used his position of authority in an incorrect way.
Here are some pertinant examples and discussions:
Color of law" refers to an appearance of legal power to act that may operate in violation of law. For example, if a police officer acts with the "color of law" authority to arrest someone, the arrest, if it is made without probable cause, may actually be in violation of law.
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
18 U.S. Code ァ 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
US Code
Notes
prev | next
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90?84, title I, ァ 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100?90, title VII, ァ 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103?22, title VI, ァ 60006(b), title XXXII, ァァ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, ァ 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104?94, title VI, ァァ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
Here is is in black and white, 18 U.S. Code ァ 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law, means that if an officer and joe blow do something to you.. that the officer has a second, separate penalty to answer to. So yes.. the officer is 'more wrong'.