California
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 14,932
- Location
- An hour north of San Francisco
- Tractor
- Yanmar YM240 Yanmar YM186D
My own theories - no validation so far - are:
1) Project management. A colleague once got away with titling her internal audit report on project cost control as: 'We can find no focus of authority and responsibility.'
*
2) Not an engineer but my instinct as a amateur is the bridge was designed to be carried into place by lifting it at each end. With a panel between the truck and the bridge to spread stress. Instead the North end was lifted with the weight bearing on a narrow line 20 (?) ft in from the end, so that the end was cantilevered over that narrow lift point - overstressing that line (which is where the bridge first broke) and possibly stretching a tensioning rod. Additionally the chart lists no rods for the last chord. That has to be an error in that (early) version of the drawing or else a gross error when moving the bridge, to support the bridge in a way that stretched an unreinforced chord.
1) Project management. A colleague once got away with titling her internal audit report on project cost control as: 'We can find no focus of authority and responsibility.'
2) Not an engineer but my instinct as a amateur is the bridge was designed to be carried into place by lifting it at each end. With a panel between the truck and the bridge to spread stress. Instead the North end was lifted with the weight bearing on a narrow line 20 (?) ft in from the end, so that the end was cantilevered over that narrow lift point - overstressing that line (which is where the bridge first broke) and possibly stretching a tensioning rod. Additionally the chart lists no rods for the last chord. That has to be an error in that (early) version of the drawing or else a gross error when moving the bridge, to support the bridge in a way that stretched an unreinforced chord.