L vs M series Kubotas?

[Jason280]

I've had a Kubota L4330 since around 2006, and just sold it with plans on replacing with a new L4701. The 4330 was dead solid reliable, and never had any issues with the tractor...so I have been very happy with the L series. On the other hand, the dealer is offering an MX5200 for around $3k more...question is, is the extra 4-5hp and beefier MX frame worth an additional $3k? I know the MX series offer rear remotes and telescoping lift arms, any other significant advantages?

 

[sea2summit]

Between the L and MX or L and M?

For the L to MX the big thing for me was FEL capacity (~950lbs vs ~2k+) which I wanted to effectively use a grapple and move round bales. The next thing was PTO HP (~35hp vs ~45hp) which I wanted for mowing and whole house generator, still haven't gotten a 3pt genny but I'm glad I have plenty of HP for mowing.

The jump from L to M would be even greater, not so much FEL capacity but you're in the mid 50's for PTO HP.

 

[Jason280]

I need to check, but it was likely an MX series (now that I think about it).

 

[Jchonline]

I need to check, but it was likely an MX series (now that I think about it).

Yes please update your original post to L vs MX if that is the case. The M series is Ag Utility, no HST transmission offering (gear only)...just a machine built for different purposes than a compact (L) or compact utility (MX).

 

[Hay Dude]

M is tougher

 

[jeff9366]

MX has larger wheels and tires front and rear than any L.

MX has heavier Category 2 Three Point Hitch. Kubota provides pin bushings so you can pull Category 1 implements equally well.

MX has two part rims when you order R4 tires, so rear wheel stance is adjustable with R4 tires.

Probably three times as many units of MX are sold, relative to L4701.

Buy the MX.

If you are over 55 years of age buy a Kubota 'Grand L'. Your aging body will thank you every day.

 

[sixdogs]

I have an L4300 and an MX5100. The MX is much more substantial and I take that one whenever it works for me. Both are absolutely first class and totally reliable so no problem there. If I had to pick one it would be the MX.

My only issue would be TIER 4 concerns.

 

[rbtjr]

We had an L3800 and needed to move up in size. We compared the L4701 and the MX series and settled on the MX5800. We really like it. For a relatively small additional cost, you will get a lot more capacity all around with the MX.

 

[Grandad4]

Jason, your L4430 is a "Grand L" model. The L4701 you are considering is a "standard L" model. It will have fewer features and may offer the same or even slightly less performance than your 4330 even though it has a bit more hp. In contrast, an MX would be a step up from the 4330. Not a huge jump, but enough you would notice.

Up to you decide what you want. Was there anything specific about the 4330 prompting thoughts of replacing it? The new ones you're looking at are more similar to your current tractor than they are different.

 

[Code54]

I went from an L to a MX. The MX is a nice step up and a good deal heavier duty for not a whole lot more money.

 

[oosik]

When I upgraded, I looked at the MX vs M. Went with the M series. Heavier tractor, higher hydraulic capacities.

Bought a brand new 2009 M6040. It's been an excellent tractor.

There are a very few times - wish I'd have gone bigger, same with going smaller. The M6040 hit a sweet spot for my needs.

 

[Hay Dude]

I liked my little M7040. Tough little bugger. Pulled a round baler!

 

[big bubba]

Yes please update your original post to L vs MX if that is the case. The M series is Ag Utility, no HST transmission offering (gear only)...just a machine built for different purposes than a compact (L) or compact utility (MX).

yes, MX series is in a mid range series between L & M, but a far cry from the M series. MX is a decent tractor, had a 5000 once. bare bones & solid, a slight notch above the L series, not much though (once owned a L4400 as well).
definately test drive the MX extensively to get the feel over the L best regards

 

[Hay Dude]

L and MX nice tractors, but I’d rather have a lightly used M than a new MX or L

 

[fruitcakesa]

I started off with an L4630 GSTC and loved it but it was aging and I wanted to get into something bigger.
Found a used pre-tier 4 M6040 DTC for a great price and snapped it up.
The M is a beast compared to the L in all categories. Larger wheels, much higher loader capacity and of course 15 more hp.

 

[AndyMA]

I have a MX5200 and it is one solid stable machine

With a 900 pound grapple on front it can still life huge logs

Andy

 

[jeff9366]

 

[geohorn]

Good commentary on MX versus M tractors. They are not the same at all.

 

[sea2summit]

Good commentary on MX versus M tractors. They are not the same at all.

Well, they are both orange

 

[big bubba]

From L, to MX, to M. the OP has the good sense to inquire. IMHO the step from L to MX is a small one. the next step from either L or MX to M series utility tractor is a big one. Jeff & sea2summit explained that well in above posts My experience has been the same. The MX series has always struck me (from ownership of both) to be a wannabe M series tractor. The OP should carefully explore the reasons from stepping up from current L series for current & future needs. Any upgrade shoud be to solve a specific need. the future need forecast sometimes gets complex
personally, i'd never consider going back to MX with my current tractor, but each owner has their own needs. & more importantly, their wallet... best regards