Gov't mandates gas can flame arrestors.

[jyoutz]

Right, and thats the way it should be. Crossing from one country into another should be carefully monitored. Thank God in some places it is, because the fentanyl and other illegal drugs being brought here is an atrocity.

It would seem rather stupid to hunt along a border where so many illegal crossings are happening. What if someone mistook a border agent in the brush hunting for illegal crossers for a jackwabbit? Probably much smarter that you went elsewhere.

And yet millions still slip by each year. Seems we set records every month for crossings more and more lately?
Wonder how that works, especially with your keen eyes confirming it takes hours to cross the border legally.

Maybe they have a Star Trek “transporter”?
Beam me up to the USA, land of safe gas cans.

Look up New Mexico Oryx hunting and where the hunting units are: they are next to white sands along the border. That’s where people hunt them. Yes there are issues with drug smuggling and always will be as long as there is a U.S. market. They also come through the coasts and Canada. (Which indeed has an open border). Most undocumented people are here for jobs, not drug smuggling. A lot of them come here on short term visas and don’t leave because our system is broken and congress won’t fix it. And employers are never prosecuted for hiring these people, so it continues. There is no requirement to use e-verify for hiring, so it’s voluntary. A lot of things that congress needs to fix, but they don’t.

 

[jyoutz]

I agree the gas can thing is stupid. But so is the dirty environmental conditions that were cleaned up. The EPA should be called out on stupid gas can things, but to suggest it shouldn’t exist means we will be back in the dirty 70s again.

 

[Hay Dude]

I agree the gas can thing is stupid. But so is the dirty environmental conditions that were cleaned up. The EPA should be called out on stupid gas can things, but to suggest it shouldn’t exist means we will be back in the dirty 70s again.

There can be an EPA, but it should come with a balanced mentality.
Regulating entire American manufacturing sectors out of existence isn’t exactly what I’d call balanced.

Maybe include a one time use flame suit with every plastic gas can?

 

[Username Taken]

I don't understand your rationale. USA was dirty before EPA and now is much cleaner. I'd rather live where i can drink water, breath air, eat food and my grandkids can do the same. But i'm probably not going to toss the baby out with the bath water, so there is that.

19 pcs Gas Can Spout Replacement Set, Gas Can Nozzle 5 Gal ，3 Bendable Tubes，3 Screw Collar Coarse Thread &3 Fine Thread-Fits Most of The Cans,3 Threaded caps ，6 Vent Caps 1 Drill Lid

Thanks, just put it on my wish list...

 

[MossRoad]

How was the Blitz can any more "defective" than any other plastic gas can ...

Never said it was. Just reporting on the facts of what happened to Blitz.

 

[2manyrocks]

Lawyers would say it is foreseeable that idiots won’t use the suits.

I wouldn’t be shocked if the gas can makers sort of want the CPSC to mandate flame arrestors so they all have to provide them. But I also suspect they think people are still going to be stupid enough to throw gas onto a fire and sue them anyway.

The thing that taints the idea of mandated fire arrestors is the bad experience most everyone has had with the mandated spill proof nozzles even though they are two different things.

 

[2manyrocks]

Never said it was. Just reporting on the facts of what happened to Blitz.

I was just posing the question why they were any different than other gas can makers. IDK if there were other factors that made Blitz face so much litigation. Of all the cans I own, theirs seem to pour the best.

Just speculating because I don’t know the engineering aspects here, but perhaps any can design that allows fuel to flow well also allows vapors to flow more easily? The concern for me would be if they impose another change to fuel cans to attempt to remedy the flame Arrestor situation that makes it even harder to pour fuel if that is even possible after they put spill proof spouts on the cans.

 

[Username Taken]

Why do diesel cans need the same regulations? Last I checked, diesel wasn't nearly as flammable as gasoline. Not even close. Not even a little bit close. Not in the same ball park. Not in the same galaxy.

So why does the EPA have such a hard-on for anything diesel?

Ford Fiesta diesel review | Auto Express

The new Ford Fiesta diesel range won't be as popular as the petrol options but the supermini's strengths are still evident

www.autoexpress.co.uk

In terms of fuel economy, Ford claims that this 84bhp powerplant manages 88.3 mpg on a combined run

 

[K5lwq]

I wonder what regulations will be put on the electron cans for the new EVs?

 

[MossRoad]

Why do diesel cans need the same regulations? Last I checked, diesel wasn't nearly as flammable as gasoline. Not even close. Not even a little bit close. Not in the same ball park. Not in the same galaxy.

So why does the EPA have such a hard-on for anything diesel?

Ford Fiesta diesel review | Auto Express

The new Ford Fiesta diesel range won't be as popular as the petrol options but the supermini's strengths are still evident

www.autoexpress.co.uk

Because people put gasoline in diesel cans, diesel in gasoline cans, gas in water jugs, etc. Heck, you can find many mentions of TBN members doing just that.